Teams

Yen/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-01vs Miller/MemphisWon 50
W#1 DoublesDongwoo Kim / Aman Seth vs Kevin Mencke / Praveen Kumar G6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSteven Philips vs Alex Jankov6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMiles Miller / LUIS IVAN BAZAN FLORES vs James French / Doug Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBALAJI KRISHNAIAH vs Matthew Beickert6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDrew Mascolino / Vetro Vetro vs Kevin Miller / Bret Stockton6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Alfredo Ale
published 4
3.75
BALAJI KRISHNAIAH
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Aman Seth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Dongwoo Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Steven Philips
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Vetro Vetro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Diego Hijano
published 3.5
3.37
Drew Mascolino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Irwin Corpuz
published
3.23
Darrell Nephew
published 3.5
3.07
Jonathan Yen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.05
Patrick Campbell
published
LUIS IVAN BAZAN FLORES
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miles Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dongwoo Kim + Jonathan Yen314 matchesnot enough data
BALAJI KRISHNAIAH + Drew Mascolino303 matchesnot enough data
Drew Mascolino + Steven Philips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alfredo Ale
29W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
BALAJI KRISHNAIAH
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Aman Seth
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Dongwoo Kim
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Steven Philips
27W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Vetro Vetro
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Diego Hijano
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Drew Mascolino
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Irwin Corpuz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Darrell Nephew
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jonathan Yen
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Patrick Campbell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
LUIS IVAN BAZAN FLORES
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Miles Miller
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.