Teams

JDS-BENDALL

2025 · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNyquira Waller vs Angie Barajas0-6, 1-6
2025-10-07vs MATA/Angie BarajasLost 02
L#1 DoublesNyquira Waller / Margaret Cox vs Valerie Reynolds / Wendy Way2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlpa Patel / Laura Wyche vs Caroline Waldrep / Neha Deopuria4-6, 0-6
2025-09-30vs MATA/Angie BarajasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBonnie Cornelius / Sydney Lewis vs Caroline Waldrep / Ana Hernandez4-2
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cox / Maria Hart vs Wendi Peacock / Lauren Mauldin5-1
2025-09-23Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLaura Wyche vs Gracie Preston Rigby0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Cox / Maria Hart vs Wendy Way / Ana Hernandez2-6, 0-6
2025-09-16vs MATA/Angie BarajasLost 02
L#1 DoublesNyquira Waller / Bonnie Cornelius vs Wendy Way / Wendi Peacock2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlpa Patel / Sydney Lewis vs Angie Barajas / Neha Deopuria2-6, 1-6
2025-09-09vs MATA/Angie BarajasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNyquira Waller / Bonnie Cornelius vs Valerie Reynolds / Caroline Waldrep6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlpa Patel / Laura Wyche vs Wendi Peacock / Lauren Mauldin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNyquira Waller / Alpa Patel vs Gracie Preston Rigby / Ana Hernandez4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Hart vs Valerie Reynolds1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MATA/Angie Barajas70192578
2JDS-BENDALL0721939238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Sydney Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Bonnie Cornelius
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.28
Maria Hart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Debra Johnson
published 2.5
2.25
Nyquira Waller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.24
Alpa Patel
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 2.5
1.85
Laura Wyche
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Cornelius + Alpa Patel314 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Cornelius + Nyquira Waller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Lewis
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Bonnie Cornelius
12W–31L career · 14 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Maria Hart
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Debra Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nyquira Waller
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Alpa Patel
16W–33L career · 16 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Laura Wyche
0W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.