Teams

TTC -Taylor

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-06vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Taylor / Trisha Watson vs Mary Jo Pecoraro / Deena Helton1-6, 4-6
2021-11-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesTerra Hovan vs Marisa Rushin6-1, 6-0
2021-11-15vs Suntree - FordLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrisha Watson / Lisa Shaffer vs Lina Ruhlman / Amira Tolles2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Osborn / Terra Hovan vs Tandy Baerst / Lisa Stirtzinger1-6, 5-7
2021-11-08vs TTC - LeiterWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Terra Hovan vs Bonita Madden / Jessica Martinez6-0, 7-6
2021-11-03vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Terra Hovan vs Michelle Ruether / Lori Abbott5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTrisha Watson / Teresa Osborn vs Mary Jo Pecoraro / Karen Kelly2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-11-01vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Terra Hovan vs Lily Voepel / ANITA CARBONE6-3, 6-4
2021-10-18vs Fee - LuerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Terra Hovan vs Erin Conway / Deborah Phillips4-6, 5-7
2021-10-11vs Suntree - FordWon 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Taylor / Terra Hovan vs Veronica Scott / Darien Lawrence6-4, 6-1
2021-10-04vs TTC - LeiterLost 01
L#3 DoublesTrisha Watson / Teresa Osborn vs SARA BRESETTE / Leslie Pankey4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Terra Hovan
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.09
Janine Brunkala
published
2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.73
Susan Wilkes
published
2.59
Eileen Stapleton
published 3
2.38
Lisa Shaffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trisha Watson + Terra Hovan4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Terra Hovan
108W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Janine Brunkala
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Susan Wilkes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Eileen Stapleton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Lisa Shaffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.