Teams

CDTA S A18M3.0 3River Trails Ciuca Sun 6 $26

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over wknd · nght

21 players · average NTRP 3.28 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesAtharv Koshti / Ali Matin vs Jonathan Essig / Dan Miller4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAli Wadia / Jeremy Brooks vs David Schultz / Matt Cohen6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesArvin Boyon / Henry Tran vs Bill Swartz / Christian Trujillo4-6, 3-4
L#1 DoublesAlex Wu / Jeremy Brooks vs Raynard Laylo / Patrick Gayatin6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAli Wadia vs Teddy Woloszyn6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Kenny / Arvin Boyon vs Andrew Servita / Nicholas Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRicardo Uriostegui vs Erik Astranskas1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Johnsen / Travis Marks vs Hilario Salgado / Luciano Tovar1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAli Matin / Davis Scott vs Nick Miller / Brett Leibsker6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTJ Billard vs Ross Lehrman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesManuel Rus / Thomas Scanlan vs Jim Rowe / Ethan Rowe6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Kenny / David Johnsen vs Nathan Lurz / Nicholas Beckwith1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesManuel Rus / Andrew Paik vs Raymond Tan / Joseph Olstein6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Hattery / Travis Marks vs Ryan Gawel / C Haid1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesManuel Rus / Alex Wu vs Frank Barbaro / Shawn Budde2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAtharv Koshti vs Brad Fujii6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEilbron Davood / Thomas Kenny vs Gerald Granath / Jake McClintock6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTJ Billard vs Bob Jenkins6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Scanlan / Joseph Vitacco vs TERENCE MCMAHON / Edward Sargent6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · nght
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A18M3.0 4Homewood Salgado Sat 12 $224119613132
2CDTA S A18M3.0 3River Trails Ciuca Sun 6 $264116920148
3CDTA S A18M3.0 1MT Chi Brown-1 Sat 3 $31.532141127194
4CDTA S A18M3.0 6Centennial McMahon Sat 1 $2023111430202
5CDTA S A18M3.0 2MT Chi Brown-2 Sat 1 $31.52391634231
6CDTA S A18M3.0 5MT Bann (OUT) Reese Sun 6 $270561939260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Adrian Ciuca
published 4
3.30
Ali Wadia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Ali Matin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Davis Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Tyler Hattery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Atharv Koshti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.07
Alex Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Joseph Vitacco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Manuel Rus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Eilbron Davood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
David Johnsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Arvin Boyon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Thomas Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Paik
published 3
2.75
TJ Billard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
James Kane
published
Jeremy Brooks
published
John Toepfer
published
Ricardo Uriostegui
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Thomas Scanlan
published
Travis Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Paik + Manuel Rus5066% games+10.0% vs expected
Davis Scott + Alex Wu314 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Kenny + TJ Billard224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Kenny + David Johnsen314 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Kenny + Alex Wu123 matchesnot enough data
Alex Wu + Manuel Rus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrian Ciuca
246W–154L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.06
3.5
Ali Wadia
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Ali Matin
16W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Davis Scott
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Tyler Hattery
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Atharv Koshti
21W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Alex Wu
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Joseph Vitacco
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Manuel Rus
44W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Eilbron Davood
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
David Johnsen
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Arvin Boyon
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Thomas Kenny
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Andrew Paik
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
TJ Billard
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
James Kane
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeremy Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Toepfer
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo Uriostegui
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Scanlan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Marks
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.