Teams

McKinney/Pike-Cady W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Alyce Kaetzel / Jana Ricker vs Michelle Marketos / Lisa Donohoe0-6, 0-6
2026-05-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesJana Ricker / Marissa Saluja vs Melany White / Patricia Arvanitis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Alyce Kaetzel / Jana Ricker vs Maria Caldwell / Beth Parks3-6, 4-6
2026-05-08vs RGAC/Raley-Stark W4.0TWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Alyce Kaetzel / Jana Ricker vs Donelle Raley / Kelley Stark6-2, 6-2
2026-05-07vs Kiest/Albus W4.0TLost 01
L#3 DoublesJana Ricker / Mary Alyce Kaetzel vs Nicole Eschliman / Holly Friedman0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Galia Goya
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.78
Michaela Cady
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Kristin Rosenbaum
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.68
Linsey Ethington
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Stacy Nobles
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.67
Sundee McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Marissa Saluja
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.63
Tao Kang
usually #1 Singles 85%, also #2 Singles 15% · published
3.58
Melissa Stevenson
published
3.58
Paola Gerber
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.55
Duygu Uzun
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Jennifer Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Cristin Pike
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.41
Jana Ricker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.34
Jennifer Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dugan + Sundee McDonald3355% games+10.1% vs expected
Paola Gerber + Mary Alyce Kaetzel3251% games+3.7% vs expected
Stacy Nobles + Kristin Rosenbaum131153% games+2.2% vs expected
Cristin Pike + Michaela Cady4354% games−2.3% vs expected
Mary Alyce Kaetzel + Sundee McDonald6747% games−9.6% vs expected
Marissa Saluja + Michaela Cady1544% games−10.5% vs expected
Melissa Stevenson + Cristin Pike3342% games−14.3% vs expected
Cristin Pike + Jennifer Dugan4451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Galia Goya
38W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Michaela Cady
37W–46L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Kristin Rosenbaum
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Linsey Ethington
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Stacy Nobles
21W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Sundee McDonald
22W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
32W–30L career · 8 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
Marissa Saluja
15W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Tao Kang
33W–35L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Melissa Stevenson
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Paola Gerber
22W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Duygu Uzun
46W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Jennifer Garrett
4W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Cristin Pike
27W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Jana Ricker
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
Jennifer Dugan
20W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.