Teams

ALPINE HILLS 55AW6.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kerry Loftus
published
3.23
Elizabeth Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Joi Deaser
published
3.08
Jacklyn Sage
published
3.00
Kimberly Kletter
published
2.98
Michelle Dike
published
2.94
Diane Russell
published 3
2.89
Whitney Murphy
published
2.85
Aimee Armsby
published 3
2.81
Audrey Tse
published 3
2.81
Joanna Meiseles
published
Brigit Karle
published 3
2.75
Maria Matsumoto
published
2.69
Trish Collins
published
2.68
Elizabeth Pratt
published
2.68
Sylvia Thompson
published
2.67
Elizabeth Grover
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Samantha Bufton
published
2.61
Tine Normann-Badger
published
2.45
Mary Liston
published
2.34
Teresa Byrne
published
Rachel Berg
published
Rose Mein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Olson + Kerry Loftus3348% games−0.7% vs expected
Whitney Murphy + Audrey Tse3257% gamesnot enough data
Aimee Armsby + Samantha Bufton3257% gamesnot enough data
Trish Collins + Joanna Meiseles404 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Tse + Diane Russell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Loftus
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Elizabeth Olson
30W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Joi Deaser
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Jacklyn Sage
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kimberly Kletter
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Michelle Dike
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Diane Russell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Whitney Murphy
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Audrey Tse
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Joanna Meiseles
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.81
3
Brigit Karle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Matsumoto
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.75
Trish Collins
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Elizabeth Pratt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sylvia Thompson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Elizabeth Grover
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
Samantha Bufton
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
Tine Normann-Badger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Mary Liston
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
Teresa Byrne
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Rachel Berg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Mein
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.