Teams

ATC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs GCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Trujillo / Kathryn Trujillo vs Stephanie Carreira / Colleen Becker3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Suzanne MacKenzie vs Amy Manley / Diedre Wooden6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Mary Hogan vs Jennifer Steelman / Rebecca Potts6-3, 6-2
2022-07-11vs EM NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Katie Ozimek vs Karen Guzzetta / Stacy Roode6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Kristin Kuruvila6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Mary Hogan vs Pia Lisle / Kendal Mullins2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Trujillo / Bobbie Brandon vs Maria Dutmer / Lisa OConnor3-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs SSH BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKatie Ozimek / Silvina Sansot vs Martha Riley / Joanie Fowler6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Virginia Reichert6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Kathryn Trujillo vs Lana Pierce / Ann Olson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Mary Hogan vs Amy Curd / Ginger Angone1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-27vs LTFC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Katie Ozimek vs Krista Vickery / Alison Finley5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGinna Halverson vs Ki Kellen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Suzanne MacKenzie vs Colleen Frank / Laura Ray1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Trujillo / Bobbie Brandon vs Jennifer Solimene / Cathie Frazzini2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-20vs GAC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Ozimek / Silvina Sansot vs Debbie Yoon / Patricia Haas6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMadelaine Osborne / Ginna Halverson vs Frances Howell / Carrie Raben6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Kathryn Trujillo vs Jill Rosa / Shelli Martin6-1, 7-5
2022-06-13vs CHCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathryn Trujillo / Mary Trujillo vs Katie Reed / Emily Cunningham1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSuzanne MacKenzie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSilvina Sansot / Katie Ozimek vs Lisa Pavlakis / Nancy Shipp4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Cathryn Sheldon vs Amy Dimarco / Lisa Schwebach3-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs CACM REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Trujillo / Mary Trujillo vs Amy Abalos / Liza Butterfield1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBobbie Brandon / Cathryn Sheldon vs Carlie Odau / Julie Boes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Davis / Mary Hogan vs Rita Urness / Andrea Evashevski0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Silvina Sansot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cathryn Sheldon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ginna Halverson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Mary Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Kathryn Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.21
Bobbie Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Suzanne MacKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Katie Ozimek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Madelaine Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Trujillo + Silvina Sansot2354% games+6.3% vs expected
Silvina Sansot + Mary Trujillo111453% games+4.1% vs expected
Bobbie Brandon + Mary Trujillo8648% games−1.2% vs expected
Katie Ozimek + Silvina Sansot3255% games−2.0% vs expected
Bobbie Brandon + Cathryn Sheldon2351% games−2.1% vs expected
Kathryn Trujillo + Mary Trujillo121345% games−5.9% vs expected
Kathryn Trujillo + Bobbie Brandon224 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Brandon + Silvina Sansot044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Silvina Sansot
38W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cathryn Sheldon
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ginna Halverson
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Mary Trujillo
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Kathryn Trujillo
19W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Bobbie Brandon
24W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Suzanne MacKenzie
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Katie Ozimek
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Madelaine Osborne
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Hogan
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.