Teams

Weaver 55+ CCL (DAY)

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-30vs Mika/Laico 2025 (day)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Weaver / Shannon Stephens vs Judith Laico / Patricia Ward6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSharon Chadwick / Jeanne Stallings vs Donna Bennett / JoAnna Mika6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLori Randall / Judy Herbst vs Ann Boser / Sarah Brand6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-21vs Cottington/WallingWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Weaver / Melissa Brinkley vs Darci Buchanan / Joya Cottington6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Crumpton / Shannon Stephens vs Caroline Quinn-Alger / Joyce Walling6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Beller / Sharon Chadwick vs Loraine Beinhart / Kathleen Adams6-1, 6-0
2025-04-05vs Schmid 55 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Weaver / Melissa Brinkley vs Wendy Downing / Julia Portwood-Mallory7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Wilson / Sharon Chadwick vs Dee Schmid / Lori Richards6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Beller / Rose Zimmer vs Connie West / Anissa King1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Amy Sweyer
published 3
2.96
Lisa Beller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
LeAnn Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Shannon Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Andrea Crumpton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Melissa Brinkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Sharon Chadwick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Jeanne Stallings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Lori Randall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Herbst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Phyllis Middleton
published
Rose Zimmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Sweyer + Shannon Stephens134 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Stallings + Sharon Chadwick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Sweyer
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lisa Beller
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
LeAnn Pierce
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Shannon Stephens
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Andrea Crumpton
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Melissa Brinkley
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Sharon Chadwick
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Jeanne Stallings
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Lori Randall
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Judy Herbst
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis Middleton
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Zimmer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.