Teams

Na.Rodriguez18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Dr.Carter18AWon 50
W#1 DoublesNatalie Rodriguez / Heather Sherwood vs Kathryn Eveleth / Carter Manning6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Margolis vs Alexandra Quinn7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNadeen Baddar / Taylor Meyer vs Callie Hurst / Mallory Houchin6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Resta vs Emily Boyer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTalya Smalls / Sarah Powers vs Carly Demler / Natalie Mayur6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-27vs Su.Braga18AWon 32
L#1 DoublesHeather Sherwood / Natalie Rodriguez vs Laurel Saunders / Sarah Copley2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Margolis vs Kathryn White6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Mitalas / Nadeen Baddar vs Tina Goertz / Megan Slocum1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTaylor Meyer vs Meaghan Chilton6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesViktoriia Saibel / Ashley Resta vs Suzanne Braga / Ashley Smith6-3, 6-3
2026-04-25vs Cl.Duff18ALost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Mitalas / Heather Sherwood vs Sydney Beasley / Kelly Jones1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Margolis vs Sally Page6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Walker / Ashley Resta vs Margaret Eller / Meredith Piper4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTalya Smalls vs Claire Duff0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRiley Ragain / Nadeen Baddar vs Alisa Smith / Bailey Anthony2-6, 2-6
2026-04-19Lost 13
L#1 DoublesHeather Sherwood / Lisa Mitalas vs LaTara Lewis / Taqiyya Yasin1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNatalie Rodriguez vs Sarah Wireback0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTaylor Meyer / Nadeen Baddar vs Courtney Carey / Azariah Bell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTalya Smalls / Riley Ragain vs Anu Bhagawan / Robin Finn0-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs St.Bradley18ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesNatalie Rodriguez / Lisa Mitalas vs Christine Waychoff / Katie Warren1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Chandler Boneham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Powers / Caroline Margolis vs Julie Clark / Lisa McDermott3-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSara Walker / Taylor Meyer vs Emily Goatcher / Beth Farrell4-6, 5-7
2026-03-29vs In.NavarroGalisteo18ALost 14
L#1 DoublesNatalie Rodriguez / Sarah Powers vs Dana Aderhold / Carter Grimes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Laura Brown4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Mitalas / Taylor Meyer vs Elie Foy / Caroline Beaird6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesRiley Ragain vs Julie Bullock5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTalya Smalls / Nadeen Baddar vs Catherine George / Mary Jo Cramer0-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Br.Shait18ALost 13
L#1 DoublesTaylor Meyer / Natalie Rodriguez vs Beth Gildea / Connie Haynes6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHeather Sherwood vs Karen Southern5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Powers / Nadeen Baddar vs Josette Huntress / Stephanie Black2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesViktoriia Saibel / Ashley Resta vs Erin Hemminger / Sarah Lukz3-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs El.Schacht18ALost 23
W#1 DoublesLisa Mitalas / Sarah Powers vs Elizabeth Ellington / Elizabeth Smith6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesViktoriia Saibel vs Stuart Gupton5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRiley Ragain / Talya Smalls vs Alex Breazeale / Ellen Shook5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Resta vs Allison Gupton1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTaylor Meyer / Sara Walker vs Ellie Gilmore / Elizabeth Schacht6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Caroline Margolis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Lisa Mitalas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Viktoriia Saibel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Taylor Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.75
Natalie Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.67
Heather Sherwood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.58
Ashley Resta
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.53
Riley Ragain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.36
Talya Smalls
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.20
Nadeen Baddar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Margolis
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Lisa Mitalas
15W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Viktoriia Saibel
25W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.84
Taylor Meyer
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Natalie Rodriguez
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Heather Sherwood
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Ashley Resta
4W–4L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Riley Ragain
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Talya Smalls
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.36
2.5
Nadeen Baddar
20W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.