Teams

ATC:GetaGrip:Smeal

2024 ME Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-24vs Apex:SmashQueens:MorongWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Comeau / Barbara Cyr vs Dana DeFilippo / Lynn Berardelli4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Smeal / Lily Lam vs Lucy Bauer / Kerri Stump7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNina Boulard / Patricia Doyle vs Sarah Scott / Catalina Mehler5-7, 5-7
2024-02-11vs Apex:SmashQueens:MorongSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDebra Young / Ann Boomer vs Sarah Holland / Erin Whipple6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Galante vs Kimberly Kelly-Brewster2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Smeal / Peggy Doucette vs Dana DeFilippo / Lynn Berardelli6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Doyle / Brooke Miller vs Lucy Bauer / Kerri Stump7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Peggy Doucette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Brooke Miller
published 3.5
Ann Boomer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Cyr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cathy Smeal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debra Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Geri Novia
published 3.5
3.18
Nina Boulard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Denise Comeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lily Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Galante
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Patricia Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Arsenault
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Lam + Peggy Doucette2451% games−0.4% vs expected
Tracey Arsenault + Cathy Smeal22857% games−0.5% vs expected
Patricia Doyle + Nina Boulard224 matchesnot enough data
Geri Novia + Peggy Doucette033 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Doyle + Denise Comeau033 matchesnot enough data
Denise Comeau + Nina Boulard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Doucette
74W–72L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Brooke Miller
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Ann Boomer
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Cyr
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Smeal
55W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Debra Young
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Geri Novia
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nina Boulard
39W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Denise Comeau
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Lily Lam
28W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Galante
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Doyle
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracey Arsenault
34W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.