Teams

LWR Anderson MXD

2025 Sarasota Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 MXD Sunday

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-23vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Anderson / Megan McAloon vs Dave Barcomb / Courtney Rosenthal6-1, 6-2
2025-02-23vs Sarasota/Canfield/40&Over8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Feingold Navas / Jeff Munafo vs Nina Mortazavi / Calvin Hac3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNoelle Hage / Eric Hage vs Yudi Carpenter / Jim Capazola2-6, 2-6
2025-02-16vs Laurel Oak Rosenberg MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Anderson / Megan McAloon vs Joe Malave / Kim Pennington6-4, 6-0
2025-02-09vs Payne in the ParkLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuke Anderson / Noelle Hage vs Kyle Constantino / Sandy Harper2-6, 3-6
2025-01-26vs SSC AkiermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Munafo / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Thiago Domingues / Kim Bennaji4-6, 2-6
2025-01-12vs Sarasota/Canfield/40&Over8.0XSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJeff Munafo / Lauren Feingold Navas vs Calvin Hac / Yudi Carpenter6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLuke Anderson / Megan McAloon vs Chris Canfield / Zobeida Canfield6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
3.99
Megan McAloon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Lauren Feingold Navas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
3.79
Lauren Larkin
published
3.77
Kent Perry
published
David Arrowood
published 4
Eric Hage
published 4
Fred Damaia
published 4
3.71
Sheila Perry
published
3.48
Noelle Hage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Christopher Hugill
published 3.5
Brent Arslaner
published 3.5
Jeff Munafo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.51
4
Megan McAloon
137W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Lauren Feingold Navas
77W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.79
Lauren Larkin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Kent Perry
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Arrowood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eric Hage
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Fred Damaia
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Perry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Noelle Hage
53W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Christopher Hugill
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Brent Arslaner
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Munafo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.