Teams

DThayaprasat (Park Road)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-17Won 10
W#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs DWest (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Lauren Laughton vs Callie Schmit / Diana West6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Cassandra Wincek6-7, 0-6
2025-04-21vs DWest (Park Road)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarling Deehr / Kindell Schmitt vs Juliana Marques / Diana West2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-12vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaine Parker Horvath / Brittany Simpson vs Callie Schmit / Diana West3-6, 4-6
2025-03-29vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Jessica Mauney6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs DWest (Park Road)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Cimmino / Kindell Schmitt vs Samantha Danesis / Meghan Bartholomew6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.29
4.84
Sarah Cimmino
published
4.67
Brittney Desmond
published 5
4.63
Kindell Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.60
4.59
Lauren Laughton
published
4.56
Abbey Neff
published 5
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.26
Brittany Simpson
published 4.5
4.25
4.20
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsey Stuckey
published
Mary McGehee
published
Sanjana Sudhir
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darri Thayaprasat + Kindell Schmitt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Annabella Bonadonna Ayala
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
5.29
Sarah Cimmino
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.84
5
Brittney Desmond
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Carson Rose Tennyson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.60
Lauren Laughton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.59
5
Abbey Neff
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Brittany Simpson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Hannah English Rahill
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.25
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Lindsey Stuckey
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary McGehee
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanjana Sudhir
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.