Teams

Villages - Hoops/Bosco

2024 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-10vs FK - WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Beatrice Barlet / Rhonda Sangster4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-06vs SKY - AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Michelle Tripp / Anne Finnin7-5, 6-2
2024-02-25vs Marion/DeMartino/Adult 55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Petrea Coleman / Tana Hubbard7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-02-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Hoops / Terry Sturm vs Cindy Tammen / Sally Demontfort6-1, 6-4
2024-02-03vs FK - WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Beatrice Barlet / Kathy Hatfield6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-21vs Marion/DeMartino/Adult 55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Tracy Shisler / Peggy Ridgway1-6, 1-6
2024-01-14vs SKY - AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Suzanne Busk / Michelle Tripp3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-01-07vs SMW - BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Lorraine Hollweg / Laurie Horne6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Carol Mecca
published 3.5
3.41
Judy Hoops
published
3.32
Catherine Sersen
published 3.5
3.22
Jane Hoffman
published
3.14
Terry Sturm
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Robin Zink
published
2.93
Melanie Turner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Elizabeth Bosco
published
Maria AnneDiOrio
published
Nadine Zastrow
published
Robin Lancaster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Sturm + Melanie Turner162647% games−3.2% vs expected
Judy Hoops + Elizabeth Bosco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Mecca
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Catherine Sersen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jane Hoffman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Terry Sturm
34W–41L career · 8 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Robin Zink
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Melanie Turner
40W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Elizabeth Bosco
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria AnneDiOrio
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nadine Zastrow
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Lancaster
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.