Teams

Honey Deuce

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-05-11vs Ace Ace BabyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie Munds / Debbie Merritt vs Vicki Flume / Saundra Coronado6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.87
Karen East
published 4
3.79
Brijean Brennan
published 4
3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.37
Deniz Aygen
published 3.5
3.31
Erin Kohler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.24
Terri Mulcahy
published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristin Mumford
published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Beagles
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Kate MacKay
published
Lisa della Badia
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Tamara Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Tracie Munds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Stipp + Debbie Merritt4360% games+11.5% vs expected
Deniz Aygen + Karen East6462% games+6.5% vs expected
Brijean Brennan + Karen East241060% games+3.0% vs expected
Deniz Aygen + Terri Mulcahy1532% games−17.9% vs expected
Deniz Aygen + Lisa della Badia241452% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Heidi Stipp241057% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Terri Mulcahy12856% gamesnot enough data
Tamara Clayton + Terri Mulcahy16466% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Merritt
230W–129L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Karen East
144W–86L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Brijean Brennan
153W–118L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Heidi Stipp
166W–109L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Deniz Aygen
149W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Kohler
155W–119L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Terri Mulcahy
84W–51L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Christy Siemons
78W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Kristin Mumford
134W–81L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Beagles
77W–75L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Kate MacKay
66W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa della Badia
168W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tamara Clayton
48W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracie Munds
56W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.