Teams

APhillips/Horvath (WSRC)

2023 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-17vs PKahle (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#1 DoublesShay Hartley / Anne Mauldin vs Katherine Hargett / Patty Kahle7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Sterrett / Tina Bobrowski vs Patty Halvorsen / Wilma Pinter2-6, 1-6
2023-04-10vs CHobson (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarla Horvath / Shay Hartley vs Barbara Northrup / Cyndie Hobson0-6, 0-6
2023-04-03vs MFigard (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Chaney / Tina Bobrowski vs Sue Busby / Elaine Myers4-6, 3-6
2023-03-30vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarla Horvath / Alix Pavlic Phillips vs W Kay Bridges / Susan Stover4-6, 5-7
2023-03-20vs JHadley/JNomina (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarla Horvath / Shay Hartley vs Vickie Crawford / Janice Abluton6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-06vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#2 DoublesPat Simpson / Shay Hartley vs Linda Bollag / Cyndi Thilo6-4, 6-4
2023-02-27vs EBailey (Sun City)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMarla Horvath / Marilyn Chaney vs Candi DeLaar / Libby Fraas6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTina Bobrowski / Faye Childress vs Eileen Bailey / Johanna Johnson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Marla Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Shay Hartley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Karen Sterrett
published
3.00
Anne Mauldin
published 3.5
2.98
Faye Childress
published 3.5
2.93
2.79
Tina Bobrowski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Celia Stallings
published 3
Elizabeth Hollidge
published
Pat Simpson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Horvath + Shay Hartley2340% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marla Horvath
62W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Shay Hartley
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Karen Sterrett
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Anne Mauldin
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Faye Childress
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
3.5
Alix Pavlic Phillips
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.93
3
Tina Bobrowski
16W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Celia Stallings
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Elizabeth Hollidge
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Simpson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.