Teams

Berreth - Mixed 55s 3.5 Mon.

2024 Piedmont Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5 Mixed Dbls Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-15vs COLE - Mixed 55s 3.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Charles Moore / Tammie Hughes6-2, 6-3
2024-06-17vs Kirby - Mixed 55s 3.5 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Gay / Kimberly Gay vs David Grubbs / Karyn Efird3-6, 3-6
2024-06-10vs COLE - Mixed 55s 3.5 MonWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Theresa Atchison / Neal Hughes6-3, 6-3
2024-06-03vs Hilliard - Mixed 55s 3.5 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs David Rachels / Shelby Rhyne6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Suzanne Andia / Gilbert Andia3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed Dbls Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kimberly Gay
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
Jacqueline Herron
published
3.44
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.32
Gladys Dunn
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.27
Bernie Besterci
published 3.5
3.25
Judy Eaton
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.22
Craig Wasserman
published 3.5
3.20
Bruce Eaton
published 3.5
3.18
John Dutton
published
3.02
Lee Brogden
published
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Dutton + Patty Dutton8260% games−3.7% vs expected
Judy Eaton + Bruce Eaton314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Gay
375W–167L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Jacqueline Herron
36W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kathryn Michaud
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Gladys Dunn
28W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bernie Besterci
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Judy Eaton
38W–21L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Patty Dutton
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Craig Wasserman
19W–24L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Bruce Eaton
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
John Dutton
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lee Brogden
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.