Teams

LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Sep 16 7:00 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Sep 30 7:00 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
2026-09-02vs GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCHWon 30
W#1 DoublesEve Hammett / Ann Flodin vs Kellianne White / Yolanda Deaver6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmy Drew / Michele Peters vs Kerry Espinola / Kim Hutter6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Coward / Jennifer Magee vs Alexa Hartenstein / Jamie Scaglione4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-26vs MFulton-UNCWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Sudzina Schut / Michele Peters vs Hannah White / Julia Haslett2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Coward / Ann Flodin vs Tracy Rose / Laura Dean6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Stephens / Karen Schmitz vs Meghan Fulton / Sara Knechtel6-0, 6-3
2026-08-19vs SGraff.40.6.5C-DurLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Stephens / Lisa Simmons vs Elizabeth Chan / Sara Lawrence3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEve Hammett / Ann Flodin vs Sarah Franks / Courtney Carey7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesErin McElligott / Laura Caldwell vs Lauren Muth Humphreys / Susan Graff2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-12vs CMurray-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesEve Hammett / Laura Caldwell vs Kim Cabelka / Kristy Clare6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Moody / Jennifer Magee vs Michelle Koeneke / Preeya Gupta6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSallie Nowacek / Karen Schmitz vs Amreen Dinani / Jaclyn Weiser6-2, 6-0
2026-08-05vs MKuehn-DFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Lisa Simmons vs Adriana Doi / Meta Kuehn6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Drew / Laura Caldwell vs Diane Allen / Sarah Parker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Flodin / Michele Peters vs Colleen Cowperthwait / Emily McClernon6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MGriffiths-CHTC3090135
2KMcWhorter-DUR3081234
3RDavis-CHTC2060030
4LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC2163656
5MKuehn-DFC2163880
6SStowe.40.6.5C-SVC2154855
7SGraff.40.6.5C-Dur2163978
8JDeConto.40.6.5C-DUR2154972
9TStefan-HS1133652
10MFulton-UNC12361391
11CMurray-HR12271486
12GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH02151066
13LGilchrist-CHCC03271499
14KRyan-HVCC031817105
15SBartle.40C-DUR030918112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Cynthia Moody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Eve Hammett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Christine Sudzina Schut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Sallie Nowacek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Amy Drew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Melissa Coward
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Anne Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Erin McElligott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Ann Flodin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.15
Laura Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Michele Peters
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Karen Schmitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+1.1% vs expected
Cynthia Moody + Sallie Nowacek7264% games−1.1% vs expected
Eve Hammett + Sallie Nowacek5165% gamesnot enough data
Laura Caldwell + Michele Peters4153% gamesnot enough data
Eve Hammett + Melissa Coward314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Caldwell + Amy Drew213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Caldwell + Eve Hammett303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Drew + Anne Stephens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Moody
20W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Eve Hammett
132W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Sallie Nowacek
110W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Amy Drew
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anne Stephens
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Erin McElligott
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Ann Flodin
65W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Michele Peters
21W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Karen Schmitz
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Melinda Wright
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.