Teams

MCTL55/Bowers/RHTC

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed - 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-06vs MCTL55/Gallagher/RHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesKeith Gonzales / Sharon Wooten vs Dan Brantmeyer / Tamara Gallagher3-6, 2-6
2023-06-30vs MCTL55/Barnett/RHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Wooten / Jens Lamba vs Madlen Barnett / Rubens Silva6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Beal / Keith Gonzales vs Nicole Morris / Bill Rochester6-4, 6-2
2023-06-08vs MCTL55/Gallagher/RHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesKeith Gonzales / Cynthia Spera vs Richard Gallagher / Tamara Gallagher2-6, 3-6
2023-06-01vs MCTL55/Rawdon/RHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Hancock / Rachael Schuler vs Cindi Helms / JAMES SMITH7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJens Lamba / Sharon Wooten vs Goetz Hagen / Paula Donoghue6-3, 6-4
2023-06-01vs MCTL55/Rawdon/RHTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Hancock / Rachael Schuler vs Tim Moll / Cindi Helms6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJens Lamba / Sharon Wooten vs Goetz Hagen / Tisa Mullis6-3, 6-4
2023-05-25vs MCTL55/Barnett/RHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Hancock / Rachael Schuler vs William Harris / Jane Sickles7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Gonzales / Sharon Wooten vs Madlen Barnett / Rubens Silva3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Mixed - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Barry Bonikowski
published 4
3.82
Rachael Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Jennifer Beal
published
3.63
Jens Lamba
published
3.54
Leslie Walker
published
3.48
Keith Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Sharon Wooten
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Cynthia Spera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Lori Bowers
published
Kelly Hancock
published
Marc Parker
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Bonikowski
37W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Rachael Schuler
298W–157L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Jennifer Beal
76W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Jens Lamba
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Leslie Walker
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Keith Gonzales
45W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Sharon Wooten
102W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Cynthia Spera
128W–140L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lori Bowers
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Kelly Hancock
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marc Parker
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.