Teams

GOLDMAN TC 40AW3.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

21 players · average NTRP 2.91 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Jessica Pfannenstiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kelly Alberta
published
2.95
2.92
K Janelle Lee
published
2.92
Amy Chin
published 3
2.90
Mary Kane
published
2.81
2.81
Michelle Mah
published
2.79
Tina Freschi
published
2.73
Elizabeth Kao
published 2.5
2.71
Charlene Scheil
published 3
2.67
Crystal Gurr
published 3
2.67
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.65
Diane McCarthy
published 3
2.59
Jeri Chu
published
2.59
Barbara Koo
published 3
2.53
Amy Gregg
published 3
2.50
Joan Sills
published
2.18
Amy Ashcroft
published 2.5
Marinell Jochnowitz
published
Victoria Zaroff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Pfannenstiel
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Ashley Pellouchoud
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
K Janelle Lee
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Amy Chin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mary Kane
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Eyerusalem Gettiye
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
Michelle Mah
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Tina Freschi
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
2.5
Elizabeth Kao
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Charlene Scheil
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Crystal Gurr
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Diane McCarthy
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Jeri Chu
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Barbara Koo
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Amy Gregg
7W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Joan Sills
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Amy Ashcroft
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Marinell Jochnowitz
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Zaroff
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.