Teams

Witt

2025 TRI-LEVEL Night · Weekend 18 & Over - HSV

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-03vs ONeil-VanG-Tri-4.5-3.5-2025Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Steele / Melanie Casillas vs Mary Swinney / Makinly Baird3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Witt / Nora Vanderploeg vs Jennifer Pugh / Ginger Green5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPhilippa Bianca / Lauren Reasner vs Meleah Ellis / Amelia ONeil7-6, 6-4
2025-05-22vs ONeil-VanG-Tri-4.5-3.5-2025Lost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Steele / Kimberly Chandler vs Leila Rowan / Mary Swinney6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Pelle / Lauren Reasner vs Jennifer Pugh / Jessica Jones7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNora Vanderploeg / Lauren Wasley vs Victoria Linson / Meleah Ellis1-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs ONeil-VanG-Tri-4.5-3.5-2025Won 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Pelle / Lauren Reasner vs Leila Rowan / Mary Swinney1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Witt / Lauren Wasley vs Jessica Jones / Jody Toms6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNora Vanderploeg / Mary Katharine Payne vs Aimee League / Amelia ONeil4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weekend 18 & Over - HSV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Melanie Casillas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Stephanie Steele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Amanda Wheaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Mary Katharine Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Lauren Reasner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Angela Pelle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.23
Lauren Wasley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Philippa Bianca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Nora Vanderploeg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberly Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Steele + Kimberly Chandler8158% games+6.8% vs expected
Stephanie Steele + Melanie Casillas8459% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Casillas
42W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Stephanie Steele
147W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Amanda Wheaton
28W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Mary Katharine Payne
68W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lauren Reasner
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.37
4
Angela Pelle
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.37
Lauren Wasley
27W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Philippa Bianca
52W–69L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Nora Vanderploeg
66W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kimberly Chandler
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary-Elizabeth Reinhart
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.