Teams

Branco/Schedler

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Eugene Ashley High School
Sep 15 6:00 PM
vs
The Country Club Of Landfall
Sep 22 6:30 PM
vs
Eugene Ashley High School
Oct 1 6:30 PM
vs
Eugene Ashley High School
Oct 6 6:30 PM
vs
Eugene Ashley High School
Oct 11 3:00 PM
Althea Gibson Tennis Complex
2026-09-08vs Gilson 6.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hardison / Michelle Willis vs PJ Bolduc / JOYCE BOYLE3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSara Branner / Elizabeth Basso vs Anne Goodwin / Jessica Holleman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDarcy Burgard / Shelley Livengood vs Terry Thompkins / Melissa Brinkley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-09-01vs Russell/McCain 6.5/40+Won 30
W#1 DoublesSara Branner / Betty Schedler vs Christine Feeney / Jennifer Bradstreet4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Nerell / Shelley Livengood vs Kara Gansmann / Shannon Russell6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Kresge / Michelle Willis vs Tricia McCain / Rachel Mclean6-2, 6-1
2026-08-31vs Cannon CFCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLara Reinhart / Robyn Doss vs Ellen Losch / Helen Wells6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Nerell / Shelley Livengood vs Anne Tilghman Reiss / Lizzie Hartman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Branner / Betty Schedler vs Jessica Cannon / Trisha Price6-2, 6-1
2026-08-27vs Malone/Gainer 40+ 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Nerell / Shelley Livengood vs Andrea Talley / Kathleen Henig6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hardison / Michelle Willis vs Rosemarie Kafka / Helen Gainer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDarcy Burgard / Katherine Sullivan vs Brittany Jackson / Teri Kosterman7-6, 6-3
2026-08-20vs Murray/Broach 6.5 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Kresge / Katherine Sullivan vs Melissa Russ / Nicole Jones6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Basso / Christine Branco vs Elizabeth Gonzalez / Nikki Zeldin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobyn Doss / Shelley Livengood vs Shameena Broach / Kim Johnston6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kelly Nerell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jennifer Hardison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Lara Reinhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Darcy Burgard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Melissa Pollock
published
3.12
Sara Branner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Michelle Willis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Christine Branco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Shelley Livengood
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Heather Kresge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Betty Schedler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Elizabeth Basso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Robyn Doss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Beth Looney
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Livengood + Kelly Nerell5169% games+19.7% vs expected
Christine Branco + Lara Reinhart2442% games+2.8% vs expected
Heather Kresge + Sara Branner5845% games+0.9% vs expected
Robyn Doss + Elizabeth Basso3249% games−0.5% vs expected
Shelley Livengood + Betty Schedler2542% games−5.0% vs expected
Christine Branco + Betty Schedler044 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Willis + Jennifer Hardison224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Willis + Melissa Pollock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Nerell
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jennifer Hardison
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Lara Reinhart
27W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Darcy Burgard
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Melissa Pollock
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Sara Branner
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michelle Willis
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christine Branco
9W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.07
Shelley Livengood
30W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Heather Kresge
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Betty Schedler
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Elizabeth Basso
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Robyn Doss
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Beth Looney
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.