Teams

6SCWB-Kurosawa 45 MEN SINGLES F

2025 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 4.5+ SINGLES SEM

5 players · average NTRP 4.38 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-06vs 5BT-Manepalli 45 MEN SINGLES FWon 20
W#1 SinglesBen Friedman vs Harry Greenspan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCheng Gong vs Merrick Bay6-2, 6-1
2025-11-22vs 2LT-Beard 45 MEN SINGLES FLost 12
L#1 SinglesDan Solomon vs Logan Beard6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCheng Gong vs Robert Walker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDean Leventis vs Inbum Song1-1
2025-11-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Friedman vs Jason Chen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-08vs 1DEER-Kerin 45 MEN SINGLES FWon 21
W#1 SinglesCheng Gong vs Noah Gedrimas6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTsuyoshi Kurosawa vs Kevin Madden4-6, 1-5
W#3 SinglesDan Solomon vs Trenton Townsend6-0
2025-10-26vs 5BT-Manepalli 45 MEN SINGLES FWon 20
W#1 SinglesDan Solomon vs Merrick Bay6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCheng Gong vs Harry Greenspan6-7, 3-2
2025-10-17vs 2LT-Beard 45 MEN SINGLES FWon 20
W#1 SinglesDan Solomon vs Martin Bak1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCheng Gong vs Robert Walker6-2, 6-2
2025-10-11vs 4EAST-Kean 45 MEN SINGLES FLost 02
L#1 SinglesCheng Gong vs Jason Chen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTsuyoshi Kurosawa vs Eric Adams1-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs 1DEER-Kerin 45 MEN SINGLES FWon 21
L#1 SinglesDean Leventis vs John Andrew7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDan Solomon vs Trenton Townsend6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCheng Gong vs Kevin Madden6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.5+ SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
16SCWB-Kurosawa 45 MEN SINGLES F6217719164
24EAST-Kean 45 MEN SINGLES F5214716129
31DEER-Kerin 45 MEN SINGLES F35101430231
42LT-Beard 45 MEN SINGLES F3591532210
55BT-Manepalli 45 MEN SINGLES F2571429199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Ben Friedman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Dan Solomon
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Cheng Gong
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.90
Tsuyoshi Kurosawa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Dean Leventis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ben Friedman
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Dan Solomon
8W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cheng Gong
53W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Tsuyoshi Kurosawa
35W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Dean Leventis
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.