Teams

Wentz/Knoxville

2026 Adult 65 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 65 & over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-25vs Houck/Knoxville/65Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Elize Kikkert vs Karen Kelly / Kate Watson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Angie Herzog vs Debi Houck / Linda Jones4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEileen Webster / Lila Downs vs Teresa Helton / Teri Henry6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs Carter-Ford/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Angie Herzog vs Sandra Smith / Tina Thompson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEileen Webster / Elaine Vandiver vs Sandy Hodson / Belinda Ford1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Tucker / Mary Kathryn Cockrill vs Lucy Hand / Carolyn Hutsell6-4, 6-3
2026-06-27vs Houck/Knoxville/65Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Herzog / Peggy Strand vs Janice Whitehead / Karen Benedict6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Viehmann / Elaine Vandiver vs Debi Houck / Kate Watson0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElize Kikkert / Mary Kathryn Cockrill vs Teri Henry / Sandra Long7-5, 6-1
2026-06-20vs Carter-Ford/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Herzog / Peggy Strand vs Tina Thompson / Sandra Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Vandiver / Linda Viehmann vs Melinda Connell / Belinda Ford6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLila Downs / LuAnne Zelasko vs Donna Worrell / Carol Irick6-7, 1-6
2026-06-06vs Houck/Knoxville/65Lost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Peggy Strand vs Teresa Helton / Karen Benedict6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesEileen Webster / Elaine Vandiver vs Karen Kelly / Kate Watson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Kathryn Cockrill / Nancy Tucker vs Debi Houck / Debbie Ashton3-6, 0-6
2026-05-16vs Carter-Ford/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Angie Herzog vs Tina Thompson / Sandra Smith7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Viehmann / Elize Kikkert vs Rosemary Canada / Elaine Zeanah1-1
W#3 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Eileen Webster vs Sandy Hodson / Carolyn Hutsell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 65 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Peggy Strand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Eileen Webster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
LuAnne Zelasko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Elaine Vandiver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Linda Viehmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Elize Kikkert
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Lila Downs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Vandiver + Linda Viehmann224 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Vandiver + Eileen Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Herzog
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Peggy Strand
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Eileen Webster
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
LuAnne Zelasko
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Elaine Vandiver
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Linda Viehmann
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Elize Kikkert
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Lila Downs
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.