Teams

MBY - Cottrell 18+ Trilevel

2026 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-24vs BH - IngramWon 20
W#1 DoublesWes Hill / Walker Messer vs Lobo Tran / Kevin Carden6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGreg Cottrell / Crawford Crim vs Chad Miller / Alex Miller6-4, 6-2
2026-06-17vs Inverness CC - BodeWon 10
W#1 DoublesWes Hill / Brock Deshong vs Gatewood Thrasher / Gustavo Nieves6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAdam Cohn / Walker Messer vs David Bradford / Shawn Bradley6-3, 6-4
2026-06-03vs Highland Park - O'Brien/NicholsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPreston Scott Blakeley / Brock Deshong vs Benton Weinacker / Jason Dearing2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCrawford Crim / Greg Cottrell vs Jared Miller / Robert Mann2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-27vs PTCC - TaylorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Cohn / Preston Scott Blakeley vs Patrick Taylor / Robert Moody6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCrawford Crim / Matt Grill vs Tyler Powell / Paul Ebert6-1, 6-4
2026-05-20Won 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Cohn / Brock Deshong vs Brandon Chanco / Tyler Hutto6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Hajji / Crawford Crim vs Bryan Nowell / Mitchell Lewis6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDaniel Elliott / David Reeves vs Zeke Hrynkiw / Danny Martinez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-11vs Old Overton - CoxWon 20
W#1 DoublesWes Hill / Crawford Crim vs Thomas Taylor / Joseph Comer6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Grill / Adam Hajji vs Jared Cox / Brady Hughes6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Adam Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Brock Deshong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Walker Messer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Wes Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Luke Liapes
published
3.59
Matt Grill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Matt Lewis
published
3.57
Crawford Crim
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.47
Greg Cottrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Adam Hajji
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Daniel Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.97
David Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Maurice Sutherland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Mehar Virdi
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Preston Scott Blakeley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Cottrell + Wes Hill4254% games+5.8% vs expected
Mehar Virdi + Daniel Elliott2353% games−6.3% vs expected
Greg Cottrell + Crawford Crim404 matchesnot enough data
Wes Hill + Brock Deshong134 matchesnot enough data
Adam Cohn + Brock Deshong404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Cohn
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Brock Deshong
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Walker Messer
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Wes Hill
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Luke Liapes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Matt Grill
84W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.59
Matt Lewis
34W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Crawford Crim
21W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Greg Cottrell
32W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Adam Hajji
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Daniel Elliott
30W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
3
David Reeves
40W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Maurice Sutherland
20W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Mehar Virdi
40W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Preston Scott Blakeley
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.