Teams

WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT DeJarlais

2026 WI Mixed 40 & Over · WI Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-19vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Streeper / Austin Streeper vs Kimberly Glasbeek / Steve Prince2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Nott / Grace Wenham vs Martin Mccluskey / Kathleen Rause6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIris Kurman / Alan Shepard vs Mei Hu / John Pesh6-3, 7-5
2026-04-12vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goetz / Timothy Nott vs Steve Prince / Kimberly Glasbeek3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIris Kurman / Daniel DeJarlais vs Dan Bernhardt / Mei Hu3-6, 3-6
2026-04-04vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Goetz / Seth Dailey vs Jenny Bradley / Dan Bernhardt7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Streeper / Austin Streeper vs Mei Hu / John Pesh6-3, 6-1
2026-03-08vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Gonzaga / Alan Shepard vs Kimberly Glasbeek / Steve Prince3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Neuber / Daniel DeJarlais vs Kathleen Rause / Martin Mccluskey6-2, 6-3
2026-02-22vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Gonzaga / Timothy Nott vs Martin Mccluskey / Kathleen Rause6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Neuber / Alan Shepard vs John Pesh / Jenny Bradley6-1, 6-0
2026-02-15vs WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT HuWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Streeper / Austin Streeper vs Kathleen Rause / Martin Mccluskey6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKate Gonzaga / Timothy Nott vs Mei Hu / John Pesh6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGrace Wenham / Daniel DeJarlais vs Kimberly Glasbeek / Dan Bernhardt6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Mixed 40 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT DeJarlais4213512109
2WI Mixed 40&Over 6.0 MALT Hu2451327180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Iris Kurman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.12
Kate Gonzaga
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Anne Streeper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Donna Neuber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Elizabeth Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Seth Dailey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Daniel DeJarlais
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Alan Shepard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Austin Streeper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Timothy Nott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Grace Wenham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iris Kurman + Daniel DeJarlais224 matchesnot enough data
Anne Streeper + Austin Streeper303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Iris Kurman
66W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Kate Gonzaga
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Anne Streeper
27W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Donna Neuber
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Elizabeth Goetz
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Seth Dailey
26W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Daniel DeJarlais
24W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Alan Shepard
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Austin Streeper
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Timothy Nott
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Grace Wenham
51W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.