Teams

Rice/Steed/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-06vs Korenberg/Ramsey/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesSage Pickren / Lele Thompson vs Navie Birdwell / Courtney Fraser-Mason3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNoelle Cotey vs Carly Lawrence6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Freyer / Emily Schell vs Christina Beattie / Mary Stamelos2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Steed vs Jennifer Frank3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMadeline Long / Kacey Passmore vs Courtney Beall / Maria Schoonover6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-16vs George/Bernstein/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesChelsea Rice / Sage Pickren vs Anne Pope / Beth Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Graves vs Elizabeth Davis2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Eleanor Bartholomew vs Amy Frankel Nau / Eileen Smith3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatelyn Thorne / Allie Steed vs Betsy Bernstein / Marjorie George5-7, 2-6
2024-10-09vs Lindsay/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesChelsea Rice / Noelle Cotey vs Tiffini Lindsay / Erica Waterbury7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Graves vs Caroline Tapscott6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaroline Nally / Sage Pickren vs Sirivanh Cey Chase-Aguzzi / Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Thorne vs Kristina Kamer2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllie Steed / Victoria Marcella vs Lyudmila Topchiy / Cathy Radig6-1, 6-2
2024-10-04vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMadeline Long / Chelsea Rice vs Michelle Deng / Donna Cox2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Graves vs Claudia Paz6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllie Steed / Eleanor Bartholomew vs Heather Gillum / Lynn Blocher6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNoelle Cotey vs Olga Spittle6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLele Thompson / Emily Schell vs Laura Monesmith / Jessie Seaman5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Kacey Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Caroline Nally
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Clair Bartholomew
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Katelyn Thorne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Chelsea Rice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Allie Steed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Eleanor Bartholomew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carolyn Freyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christina Graves
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Victoria Marcella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Lele Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Emily Schell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Madeline Long
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sage Pickren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noelle Cotey + Kacey Passmore314 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Passmore + Chelsea Rice224 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Thorne + Victoria Marcella123 matchesnot enough data
Lele Thompson + Eleanor Bartholomew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Cotey
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kacey Passmore
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Caroline Nally
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Clair Bartholomew
18W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Katelyn Thorne
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Chelsea Rice
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Allie Steed
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Eleanor Bartholomew
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Carolyn Freyer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christina Graves
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Marcella
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Lele Thompson
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Emily Schell
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Madeline Long
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sage Pickren
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.