Teams

Extra Women 18+

Adult 18 & Over - USTA · EXTRA WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · EXTRA WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Extra Women 18+000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Megan Fredrickson
published
3.01
Mertha Ratterree
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Arden Riley
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.66
Marley Smith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Becca Carlton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Lori Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
1.76
Marysa Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gandy Britt
published
Jen Coody
published
Jillian Bonventre
published
Maggie Prezioso
published
Rhonda Meisner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Meisner + Lori Triplett2350% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Meisner + Marysa Thompson123 matchesnot enough data
Becca Carlton + Marley Smith033 matchesnot enough data
Marley Smith + Arden Riley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Fredrickson
22W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Mertha Ratterree
32W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
2.5
Arden Riley
15W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
Marley Smith
35W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
2.5
Becca Carlton
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Triplett
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Marysa Thompson
3W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Gandy Britt
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jen Coody
77W–51L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jillian Bonventre
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Prezioso
9W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Meisner
20W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.