← Teams

CHARB-Bartlett/Koster

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Emily McBride
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
—
Roxanne Imbrie
published 4
3.50
Sara Swanborn
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Karen Groenweghe
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Christine Wall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
—
Kathi Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2022-06-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor vs Dean Gaylor / Kelley Gaylor6-3, 6-3
2022-06-04Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Jeffrey Taylor vs Hoon Shin / Seungja Shin6-3, 6-2
2022-03-26Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesEmily McBride / Colleen Hamilton vs Sue Edmonds / Terri Bashkingy6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Wall vs Shiori Baba6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Bartlett / Karen Groenweghe vs Stephanie Jones / Pamela Meiling6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathi Gray / Sara Swanborn vs Trylla Lembke / Lorna Goth6-4, 6-2
2022-03-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesColleen Hamilton / Christine Wall vs Rie Sasakawa / Kelly Mohr6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Emily McBride vs Donna Kennish / Takumi Koyama6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSara Swanborn / Karen Groenweghe vs Laura Rundle / Lily Looi6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChristine Wall / Tara Guimont vs Leslie Bridwell / Desiree Whitehall6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Chrys Culver / Eartha Roulier6-2, 6-3
2022-02-13Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristine Wall / Tara Guimont vs Nancy Hinnen / Elizabeth Lilly6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs June Kim / Fanny Adams5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristine Wall / Tara Guimont vs Jennifer Tran / Anna Reutin7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Berta / Karen Groenweghe vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Cassia Carpio6-1, 6-2
2022-02-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesChristine Wall / Tara Guimont vs Christy Strange / Sara van Beckum1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Bartlett / Emily McBride vs JENNIFER BELOY / Tammy Carter6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesColleen Hamilton / Sara Swanborn vs Melissa Light / Carly Vendegna6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristine Wall / Sara Swanborn vs Alix Edwards / Brooke Daugherty6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Karen Groenweghe vs Kristen Benkstein / Elizabeth Domagalski7-5, 6-4
2022-01-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesEmily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Nancy Atkins / Akemi Okusada6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Wall / Kathi Gray vs Carrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Maritess Mayer vs Wanda Nijholt / Susan Suttich6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Roxanne Imbrie
46W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Sara Swanborn
52W–35L career
37%63%0%
3.50
3.5
Karen Groenweghe
82W–81L career
0%98%1%
3.31
4
Christine Wall
81W–93L career
94%6%0%
3.26
3.5
Kathi Gray
28W–50L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.