Teams

Sunrise/Perkins

2024 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-14vs Broward/Chen/50&OverCombo7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMyra Perkins / Evelyn Daniels vs Yonghong Chen / NING YAN6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-30vs Wrc/CordobaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAudrey Gayle / Myra Perkins vs Elizabeth Donalisio / Andrea Gil6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDominique Jean-Baptiste / Marcia Hampton vs SUELI GYOTOKU / Mariela Cordoba6-0, 6-4
2024-09-23vs Broward/Chen/50&OverCombo7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Daniels / Natalia Frantsevskaya vs Veronica Wank / Lory Sakay6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Perkins / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Maria Monserratte / Dana Reece1-6, 3-6
2024-09-05vs Wrc/CordobaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMyra Perkins / Andrea MacEwen vs Elizabeth Donalisio / Aurora Riccobono1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarcia Hampton / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Cristina Tomadin / Graciela Randazzo2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-26vs Dillon/LorenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAudrey Gayle / Natalia Frantsevskaya vs NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA / Amy Brown3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Natalia Frantsevskaya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Audrey Gayle
published 4
3.60
ELIZABETH GORDILLO
published
3.56
3.52
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Barbara Mariani
published 3.5
3.44
Myra Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Jenn Stokes
published
3.21
Evelyn Daniels
published
3.20
Janice Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Carter + Evelyn Daniels3255% games−0.4% vs expected
Janice Carter + Dominique Jean-Baptiste123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Natalia Frantsevskaya
169W–134L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Audrey Gayle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
ELIZABETH GORDILLO
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Paulette Janice Snagg
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
103W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Barbara Mariani
13W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Myra Perkins
24W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jenn Stokes
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Evelyn Daniels
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Janice Carter
73W–87L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.