Teams

WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-06vs FC-Good Gets-MarLost 03
L#1 DoublesKhue Tran / Vikram Srinivasan vs Yasmeen Mar / Jeremy Cheung2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Burdyshaw / Hilario Koyama vs Kristin Anderson / Michael Swei0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSavitha Krammer / Sukhandeep Singh vs Alexandra Ryan / John Monahan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-15vs CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-XuLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeepak Agrawal / Asawari Chingale vs Victor Betancourt / Donna Kim1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJacque Cao / Arun Lakshmi Narayanan vs Doni Wanat / Danielle Wanat6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-08vs CP-Cloud Warriors-ViriththamullaWon 21
W#1 DoublesVikram Srinivasan / Savitha Krammer vs Farhad Ghassemi / Christine Garnett3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeepak Agrawal / Asawari Chingale vs Savas Parastatidis / Mary Czerwinski6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacque Cao / Sukhandeep Singh vs Gamage Viriththamulla / Sherri Wolson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-01vs EDG-NambaLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Burdyshaw / Hilario Koyama vs Miye Moriguchi / Barry Nishimura1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSukhandeep Singh / Jacque Cao vs Andrew Royes / Bessie Chi3-6, 3-6
2023-06-23vs AYTC-ZakahiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVikram Srinivasan / Khue Tran vs Hien Nguyen / Mike Rasanen6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Burdyshaw / Arun Lakshmi Narayanan vs Michelle Osborn / Stan Nakano4-6, 1-6
2023-06-17vs TCSP-CornwallLost 02
L#1 DoublesHilario Koyama / Nancy Burdyshaw vs Christa Glenn / Ivan Barron2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKhue Tran / Ted Krammer vs Catherine Bursiek / Mike Bursiek2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-HBSQ-Furman7119518198
2PSC-Avengers-Kancherla7116819186
3FC-Good Gets-Mar6116513138
4NWW-CAC/SL-Fahey6116514147
5EDG-Mavericks-Gliner5215614161
6MI-Saelzer5213820178
7PL-Dos Chamucos-Escalona5213821187
8CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu5213821177
9BC-Camara/Sun5212923185
10CAC/SL-Split Step-Tracy5316820215
11MI-Rock Lobsters-Holland4312923189
12TCSP-Volleyamorous-Nguyen43111023182
13WSC-Azure-McAllen44141024189
14BC-Lee/Hancock44111327205
15TCSP-Au-Yeung44121229232
16ETC-Invisible T-Vu44101429239
17HBSQ-Court Jesters-Lane44131130243
18PL-Carter44111331238
19TCSP-Cornwall34111024191
20BELL-Mixed Up Hamsters-Harwood3491224184
21ETC-Rob's Boom Box-Wyer3481331220
22AYTC-It's Not Racquet Science-Chow3591532234
23TCSP-Crush-Wickham3591532232
24CP-Ace Breakers-Chinn25101124196
25AYTC-This is 40+ Love-Padilla2591226184
26AYTC-Zakahi2571428199
27FC-Perreault2581329212
28EDG-Double Edgers-Huang2571429195
29AYTC-Cortizone Weekend Warriors-Herrera2561532214
30WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer2551633213
31CP-Doubles Trouble-Han2561533215
32CP-TheAfterprty-Graves26101431233
33WSC-Ad-In-Adventures-Whitney1771736256
34RTC-Mixed Madness-Hansberry 40+0721938239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Vikram Srinivasan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Deepak Agrawal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Sukhandeep Singh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Ted Krammer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Arun Lakshmi Narayanan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Asawari Chingale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Savitha Krammer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Nancy Burdyshaw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Hilario Koyama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Khue Tran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Jacque Cao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Savitha Krammer + Ted Krammer171253% games+5.7% vs expected
Asawari Chingale + Deepak Agrawal10658% games+3.8% vs expected
Hilario Koyama + Nancy Burdyshaw61044% games−4.6% vs expected
Hilario Koyama + Savitha Krammer314 matchesnot enough data
Khue Tran + Vikram Srinivasan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vikram Srinivasan
58W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Deepak Agrawal
77W–56L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sukhandeep Singh
75W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Ted Krammer
41W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Arun Lakshmi Narayanan
11W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Asawari Chingale
26W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Savitha Krammer
92W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Nancy Burdyshaw
98W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Hilario Koyama
44W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Khue Tran
64W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jacque Cao
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.