Teams

Vineyards - Bowenkamp

2022 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Bowenkamp / Cari Shaw vs Deborah Washburn / Dale Schneider4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMercedes Baumann / Angela Aline vs Darlene Bell / Cheryl Kielly3-6, 2-6
2022-02-23vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Dunbar / Christine Brodsky vs Ricki Levine / Peggy Kasilowski3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Aline / Mercedes Baumann vs Joanne Alexander / Minok Allen7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-02-16vs Naples Grande - N. BlackWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Karen Dunbar vs Nancy Black / Lynn Norris6-2, 6-4
2022-02-09Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCari Shaw / Sindi Sanzica vs Deborah Washburn / Dale Schneider2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNancy Spiwak / Mercedes Baumann vs Darlene Bell / Cheryl Kielly4-6, 6-7
2022-01-26vs Sterling Oaks - P. JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Bowenkamp / Sindi Sanzica vs Jennifer Heimmel / Cindy Benike6-0, 7-5
2022-01-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Brodsky / Karen Dunbar vs Deborah Miller / Susan Wandler3-6, 1-6
2022-01-12vs Pelican Bay North - L. AllenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSindi Sanzica / Debra Bowenkamp vs Michele Megas-Ditomassi / Nancy Ferguson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCari Shaw / Karen Strand vs Peggy Kasilowski / Ricki Levine4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-05Split 11
W#1 DoublesCari Shaw / Sindi Sanzica vs Candia Barry / Mary Lou Roush6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Bowenkamp / Mercedes Baumann vs Ann Manning / Jackie Sawicki4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Cari Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Sindi Sanzica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Mercedes Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Angela Aline
published 3.5
3.11
Christine Brodsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hildy Glick
published
Karen Dunbar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Spiwak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Shaw + Sindi Sanzica3253% gamesnot enough data
Karen Dunbar + Christine Brodsky2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cari Shaw
28W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Sindi Sanzica
104W–135L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Mercedes Baumann
76W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Angela Aline
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Christine Brodsky
23W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Hildy Glick
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Dunbar
38W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Spiwak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.