Teams

Poached and Scrambled

2024 Mixed 55 and Over League · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-14vs Hawaii/Young/55&O/6.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeri Lathrop / Peter Koziol vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Guy Okazaki3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Siok / Alan Cheung vs Sharon Lee / Rodney Resuello6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Gentry / Mike Williams vs Jacqueline Ornellas / Stuart Leong4-6, 1-6
2024-11-30vs All Mix UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerrance Revere / Maureen O'Guin vs Milton Nitta / Celia Shen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlan McClelland / Cindy Siok vs Steven Mukai / Valerie Lee4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Williams / Lisa Gentry vs Matt Lyum / Anna Lee2-6, 4-6
2024-11-23vs Hawaii/Young/55&O/6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Leclerc / Cindy Siok vs Clyde Miyasato / Becky Miller2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike Williams / Maureen O'Guin vs Wendy Kimi / Jason Furuta2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTerrance Revere / Kathleen Dinman vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Rodney Resuello2-6, 3-6
2024-11-20vs All Mix UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Wayne Jackson vs Steven Mukai / Joanne Sakamaki6-3, 3-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Cheung / Nancy Nagamine vs Keith Yasui / Linda Chung6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / Richard Leclerc vs Anna Lee / Fung Eng6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs All Mix UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Gentry / Mike Williams vs Milton Nitta / Valerie Lee6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Wayne Jackson vs Matt Lyum / Joanne Sakamaki6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Jackson / Alan McClelland vs Michael Ho / Kimmy Goldsmith3-6, 0-6
2024-11-02vs Hawaii/Young/55&O/6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Terrance Revere vs Jacqueline Ornellas / Curt Young5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Alan Cheung vs Sharon Lee / Guy Okazaki5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Richard Leclerc vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Jason Furuta3-6, 4-6
2024-10-12vs Hawaii/Young/55&O/6.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Alan McClelland vs Cheryl Hay / Clyde Miyasato3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Gentry / Richard Leclerc vs Stuart Leong / Sharon Lee5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTeri Lathrop / Wayne Jackson vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Jason Furuta3-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs All Mix UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeri Lathrop / Peter Koziol vs Milton Nitta / Valerie Lee6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Terrance Revere vs Fung Eng / Celia Shen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Richard Leclerc vs Keith Yasui / Linda Chung6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaii/Young/55&O/6.0XD802226148
2Poached and Scrambled2681634232
3All Mix Up2661840258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Teri Lathrop
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.15
Kathleen Dinman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Richard Leclerc
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Terrance Revere
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Lisa Gentry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Nancy Nagamine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Alan Cheung
published 3
Alan McClelland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Cindy Siok
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Maureen O'Guin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kit Beuret
published
Peter Koziol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Wayne Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Dinman + Terrance Revere4256% gamesnot enough data
Richard Leclerc + Teri Lathrop2348% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Nagamine + Alan McClelland134 matchesnot enough data
Richard Leclerc + Lisa Gentry224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Lathrop
41W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Kathleen Dinman
57W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Richard Leclerc
63W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
Terrance Revere
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lisa Gentry
52W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Nancy Nagamine
55W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Alan Cheung
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alan McClelland
6W–12L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cindy Siok
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Maureen O'Guin
64W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Kit Beuret
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Koziol
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wayne Jackson
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Jackson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.