Teams

Team 2

2022 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-19vs Team 3Split 11
L#1 DoublesHerbert Hopwood / Gary McManis vs Vaughn Gatling / Dean Packard3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Rogers / Dan Winicour vs John Anderson / Richard Boothe7-6, 4-2
2022-08-15vs Team 3Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMike Geiger / Stephen Bittner vs Dean Packard / Vaughn Gatling5-7, 4-4
L#2 DoublesBruce Rogers / Dan Winicour vs Ray Stewart / Luis Ruiz6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-14vs Team 1 Cerve AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Bittner / Edward Cameron vs Thomas Jeffers / Geoffrey Montgomery4-6, 6-5
2022-08-12vs Team 4Won 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Rogers / Dan Winicour vs Jeff Buhl / Lenny Mayor6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephen Bittner / Herbert Hopwood vs George Gold / Michael Healy6-0, 6-0
2022-08-07Won 20
W#2 DoublesNicholas Colletti / Gary McManis vs Donald Evans / Ray Stewart6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDan Winicour / Stephen Bittner vs Albert Hsieh / Dean Packard6-4, 6-1
2022-08-03vs Team 1 Cerve AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesNicholas Colletti / Gary McManis vs Geoffrey Montgomery / Kenny Day6-2, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Donelson / Stephen Bittner vs Jeff Dearth / Lawrence Brundidge6-0, 6-2
2022-07-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Bittner / Nejat Egilmez vs Mark Anderson / Karl Kammann6-0, 6-4
2022-07-23vs Team 1 Cerve AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Rogers / Dan Winicour vs Kenny Day / Thomas Herman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Bruce Rogers
published 4.5
4.27
John Donelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Stephen Bittner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Nicholas Colletti
published
4.20
Dan Winicour
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.14
Mike Geiger
published
4.11
Gary McManis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Bittner + Dan Winicour2348% gamesnot enough data
John Donelson + Dan Winicour4163% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Rogers + Dan Winicour404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Rogers
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
John Donelson
52W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Stephen Bittner
46W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicholas Colletti
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Dan Winicour
106W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Mike Geiger
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Gary McManis
79W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.