Teams

CV-Mission Hills CC/Giacomini & Ringer

2024 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gay Hart
published 4
3.65
Caridad Pacheco
published 4
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Kim Glasgow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ilse Hine
published 3.5
Kenzie Thompson
published
Ledean Nilsen
published
Martha Church
published
Sue Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Devereaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Habeger + Colleen Muhlbradt2452% gamesnot enough data
Kim Glasgow + Martha Church224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gay Hart
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Caridad Pacheco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 12 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kim Glasgow
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ilse Hine
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenzie Thompson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ledean Nilsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Church
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Lambert
32W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.