Teams

AR/Hammersly/Fort Smith

2023 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-27vs OK/JRoberts/Queens of the CourtLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Simon / Lisa Hammersly vs Joanne Ames / Jo Clark0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Bowen / Meg Canfield vs Daryl Eaton / Janet Hicks0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Fry / Nancy Kremers vs Donna Hazle / Paula Torrence6-7, 5-7
2023-04-26vs AR/Hartz/Bakalekos/NLRLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Simon / Lisa Hammersly vs Bonnie Hartz / Carolyn Bakalekos3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Fry / Nancy Kremers vs Diane Bischof / Kate Hickey4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTerrie Hearns Wilkey / Billie Joslin vs Brenda Horne / Kathy Henson0-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs MS/Rockin23RobertsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Simon / Lisa Hammersly vs Tina Roberts / Karen Deer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Fry / Nancy Kremers vs Chris Webster / Jackie Handjis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanice Bowen / Meg Canfield vs Diane Hebert / Mary Felder7-5, 6-4
2023-04-25vs MO/VogelLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Bowen / Meg Canfield vs Judy Hollingsworth / Threasa Wotkyns7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSally Simon / Lisa Hammersly vs Robin Jones / Peg Schlacks7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerrie Hearns Wilkey / Billie Joslin vs Polly Egbert / Donna Hoffmann6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lisa Hammersly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Billie Joslin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Sally Simon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.63
Nancy Kremers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ann Fry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Bowen
published
Meg Canfield
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Terrie Hearns Wilkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Hammersly + Sally Simon3345% games−6.3% vs expected
Ann Fry + Nancy Kremers123 matchesnot enough data
Meg Canfield + Sally Simon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Hammersly
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Billie Joslin
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.09
Sally Simon
8W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Nancy Kremers
25W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Ann Fry
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janice Bowen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Canfield
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terrie Hearns Wilkey
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.