Teams

SUMMER SOUTH/MatchMakers

Adult 55 & Over Summer · 6.0 Women South

10 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-24vs 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Mada / Lisa Dennison vs Joanne Sutkin / Gail Kelly7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGuoping Barkley / Angela Gatto-Rekant vs Deborah Downs / Debora Rausch6-1, 6-3
2026-06-17vs 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Dennison / Karen Mada vs Ginny Vergara / Donela Weber2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Sanderlin / Guoping Barkley vs Kavita Goculdas / Debora Rausch6-1, 6-4
2026-06-10vs 40 LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVivian Pressley / Guoping Barkley vs Donela Weber / Ginny Vergara6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Loggia / Angela Gatto-Rekant vs Kavita Goculdas / Debora Rausch6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Mada / Lisa Dennison vs Joanne Sutkin / Ginny Vergara6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Sanderlin / Angela Gatto-Rekant vs Kavita Goculdas / Debora Rausch6-2, 7-6
2026-05-27vs 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Dennison / Karen Mada vs Donela Weber / Gail Kelly6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVivian Pressley / Susan Sanderlin vs Siobhan Kelly / Carla Ferrara6-2, 6-1
2026-05-20vs 40 LoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Mada / Guoping Barkley vs Joanne Sutkin / Gail Kelly7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVivian Pressley / Angela Gatto-Rekant vs Carla Ferrara / Donela Weber3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Loggia / Cynthia Calhoun vs Deborah Downs / Carol Mcmichael2-6, 2-6
2026-05-13vs 40 LoveWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Mada / Debra Loggia vs Joanne Sutkin / Gail Kelly2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Sanderlin / Vivian Pressley vs Carla Ferrara / Ginny Vergara6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Dennison / Guoping Barkley vs Carol Mcmichael / Deborah Downs6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.0 Women South
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SUMMER SOUTH/MatchMakers0713818166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Guoping Barkley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.01
Vivian Pressley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Karen Mada
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Dennison
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.85
Susan Sanderlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Angela Gatto-Rekant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Cynthia Calhoun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Beverly Ingram
published 3
2.40
Elizabeth Hepp
published 2.5
2.17
Debra Loggia
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Mada + Lisa Dennison404 matchesnot enough data
Beverly Ingram + Debra Loggia033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Guoping Barkley
66W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Vivian Pressley
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Karen Mada
51W–41L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lisa Dennison
33W–71L career · 7 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Susan Sanderlin
38W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Angela Gatto-Rekant
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Cynthia Calhoun
3W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Beverly Ingram
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Elizabeth Hepp
27W–50L career · no lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Debra Loggia
10W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.