Teams

1 Powhatan 3.0 Tennisbums - Kelley

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-08vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Pham vs Price Enroughty6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllen Sleeman vs Steve Campbell4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Alex Burnett2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Pham vs Chris Gaines7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAllen Sleeman vs Benton Boone7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Chris Armstrong6-1, 6-0
2025-10-19vs 3 ACAC NaputiWon 30
W#1 SinglesLong Duong vs Peter Olson6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Pham vs Greg Jabs6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAllen Sleeman vs David Naputi6-1, 6-2
2025-10-15vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllen Sleeman vs Joseph Gault6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRichard Stowers vs John Haggai6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesByron Chafin vs Lance Pessarra2-6, 6-7
2025-10-08vs 7 Westwood WestWon 21
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Pham vs Stan Craig6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Stowers vs Ken West6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesPhilip Chung vs Brian Kinnear0-6, 1-6
2025-10-01vs 5 LPC MorganLost 03
L#1 SinglesAllen Sleeman vs Will Gauden7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMalik Mathews vs Emmit Wright5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBilly Walter vs Robert Meister6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Pham
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.95
Richard Stowers
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.88
Byron Chafin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Allen Sleeman
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.71
Long Duong
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Billy Walter
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.24
Malik Mathews
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Philip Chung
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Pham
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Stowers
8W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Byron Chafin
19W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Allen Sleeman
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Long Duong
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Billy Walter
4W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Malik Mathews
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Philip Chung
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.