Teams

Cheval - D. Agnew

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-16vs LifeTime Team 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Diana Castellanos vs Gia Marinelli / Alexis Schulman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Bansky / Petti Waggoner vs Elena Leonov / Jacqueline Luhrs0-6, 2-6
2026-03-06vs Arbor Greene - D. ConnellLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Heitner / Maggie Lichtman vs Devon Connell / Susan Frisina6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCindy Bansky vs VEENA RAMESH0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Weber / Cheryl Bell vs Stacy Leatherman / Jennifer Wittenbauer5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-27vs Plant City - C. ScalettaWon 21
L#1 DoublesBridget Erickson / Diana Castellanos vs Julie Thompson / Dorothy Flair4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs Margie Kaercher6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Petti Waggoner vs Melissa Grimes / Cynthia Scaletta6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-23vs PC Overserved Green Team - S. BraySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Petti Waggoner vs Caro Massari / Jessica Shea0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Dietz vs Susanna Bray6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesPetti Waggoner / Linda Weber vs Jenna Albertson / KERRI-ANN Blake4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Bansky vs Dusty Jackson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Cheryl Bell vs Bruna Simoes / Silvia Perucica6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-16vs HILLS/CornellLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lichtman / Katie Dietz vs Dhara Patel / Karalee Kulek-Luzey7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBridget Erickson vs Nicole Fernandes0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLAURA Martin Santana / Cheryl Bell vs Joanne Hurley / Angela Herren3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Denise Agnew
published 4.5
2.91
Elizabeth Heitner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Katie Dietz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Ingham
published 2.5
2.24
LAURA Martin Santana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Maggie Lichtman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Cheryl Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Petti Waggoner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.14
Diana Castellanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Bridget Erickson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.90
Cindy Bansky
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.83
Linda Weber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Lichtman + Petti Waggoner3350% games+0.4% vs expected
Petti Waggoner + Katie Dietz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Agnew
97W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Elizabeth Heitner
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Katie Dietz
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Barbara Ingham
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
LAURA Martin Santana
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Maggie Lichtman
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cheryl Bell
34W–66L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Petti Waggoner
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Diana Castellanos
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Bridget Erickson
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Cindy Bansky
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Linda Weber
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.