Teams

Casey

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-10vs RabinLost 01
L#1 DoublesSumiyo McShea / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Kathy Greene / Catherine Iosue6-7, 0-2
2024-06-18vs RabinSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBeverly Taylor / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Kathy Greene / Susan Greenwood7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Casey / Sandra Julian vs Catherine Iosue / Karen Rabin1-6, 0-6
2024-06-07vs RabinWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Sandra Julian vs Marjorie Guroff / Elaine Kujawa6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Gallacher / Karen Casey vs Susan Greenwood / Janet Lasken2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-29vs RabinLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Julian / Trudy McFall vs Jane Acri / Mary Hoferek3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Karen Casey
published
2.92
Julie Chrisco Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Angela Gallacher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
2.38
Sandra Julian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Virginia Haley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Casey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Julie Chrisco Andrews
155W–97L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Angela Gallacher
48W–62L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Sandra Julian
34W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38
Virginia Haley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.