Teams

Strange Babes

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Christy Strange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Morgan Sugar-BUtter / Cate Harrington6-4, 6-2
2023-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Tina Farrelly / Carrie Putsch6-2, 6-4
2023-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Nikki Blackburn-Orr / Heike Droste6-3, 6-0
2023-07-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Tami McAra / Michele Snyder6-3, 6-4
2023-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Christy Strange vs Sara van Beckum / Jin Velasco6-1, 6-1
2023-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Colleen Nolan / Erin Casey6-4, 6-2
2023-06-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Inna Vlad / Karina Frid6-3, 6-2
2023-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Leah Buxman vs Nikki Blackburn-Orr / Heike Droste6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.