Teams

DTP GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs CACM GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJordan Wagner / Brooks Savage vs James Parker / Kendall Lin2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMARC NORRIS vs Edward Timmins0-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs GAC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMARC NORRIS / Warren Lubchenco vs Shawn Harrison / Navraj Heer3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJordan Wagner vs Michael Mauro6-3, 6-4
2026-08-05vs GTC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesJordan Wagner / Warren Lubchenco vs Suresh Gevaran / Nikolai Voitsekhovitch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMARC NORRIS vs Sachin Suresh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooks Savage / Gavin Berkey vs Ian Graffagna / Ralf Weizenbeck6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-04vs WP-G REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJordan Wagner / Warren Lubchenco vs Lionel Pomerantz / Chad Whitmer4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMARC NORRIS vs Max Volino2-6, 0-6
2026-07-29vs CP BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesJordan Wagner / Warren Lubchenco vs David Capra / Barry Zink6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrooks Savage vs Stephen Rozman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMARC NORRIS / Gavin Berkey vs Casper Lundemann / Michael Whitman1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Warren Lubchenco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Jordan Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.73
Gavin Berkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Brooks Savage
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
MARC NORRIS
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Wagner + Warren Lubchenco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Warren Lubchenco
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jordan Wagner
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.89
Gavin Berkey
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brooks Savage
2W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
MARC NORRIS
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.