Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs SSHP GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurni Blanchard / Leigh Laughlin vs Angie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Jennifer Garbiso Hall6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarey Madsen / Patti Hildebrand vs Susan Ducey / Valerie Norris3-6, 2-6
2022-07-18vs CK REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLara Callas / Elaine Gailloux vs Kimberly Kaiser / Brenna Simpson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEsther Yao / Carey Madsen vs Debbie McGough / Sandra Tate1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Laughlin / Suzanne Audino vs Katy Dunne / Gi Gi McShane3-4
2022-07-07vs KC BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatti Hildebrand / Elaine Gailloux vs Jill Strietelmeier / Sheila Gossen1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLara Callas vs Nicole Manutes7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsther Yao / Jana Warwick vs Jody Dart / Terri Jennings2-6, 2-6
2022-06-27vs HRCA BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJana Warwick / Lara Callas vs Carey Devin / Karie Lehigh2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Debbie Lew6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurni Blanchard / Debra Etzel vs Amy Quinette / Sharon Johnson6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Audino / Esther Yao vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-20vs BCST BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesEsther Yao / Carey Madsen vs Jayme Mansfield / Marilee Yorchak7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Amy Meadows6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJana Warwick / Leigh Laughlin vs Andrea Rowley / Pam Gelwick6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLaurni Blanchard / Debra Etzel vs Molly Beach / Carol Zimlinghaus6-3, 6-1
2022-06-13vs CK REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesLara Callas / Elaine Gailloux vs Kerri Luther / Amanda Halsey5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarey Madsen vs Katy Dunne3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Etzel / Jana Warwick vs Kimberly Kaiser / Brenna Simpson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Audino / Patti Hildebrand vs Jennifer Gilliland / Debbie McGough1-6, 3-6
2022-06-11vs SSHP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeigh Laughlin / Debra Etzel vs Angie Lutterman / Jeni Anderson6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Jennifer Garbiso Hall6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJana Warwick / Patti Hildebrand vs Valerie Norris / Gena Erwin0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarey Madsen / Laurni Blanchard vs Marty Oliver / Susan Ducey3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Lara Callas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.83
Elaine Gailloux
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.69
Debra Etzel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Kelli Murphy
published
3.48
Suzanne Audino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Laurni Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Jana Warwick
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Carey Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Patti Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Esther Yao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leigh Laughlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurni Blanchard + Debra Etzel3352% games+5.1% vs expected
Debra Etzel + Jana Warwick1444% games+0.4% vs expected
Leigh Laughlin + Debra Etzel4454% games+0.3% vs expected
Patti Hildebrand + Suzanne Audino1533% games−1.9% vs expected
Jana Warwick + Suzanne Audino6455% games−2.2% vs expected
Elaine Gailloux + Lara Callas7353% games−2.8% vs expected
Laurni Blanchard + Kelli Murphy31440% games−4.2% vs expected
Debra Etzel + Kelli Murphy4152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lara Callas
115W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Elaine Gailloux
88W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Debra Etzel
69W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kelli Murphy
18W–33L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Suzanne Audino
49W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Laurni Blanchard
19W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
Jana Warwick
51W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Carey Madsen
21W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Patti Hildebrand
18W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Esther Yao
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Laughlin
22W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.