Teams

Maximum Tennis

2023 40&Over Women · 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-18vs SPORTIME Westchester ArmadaLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Moira Lillis vs Carrie Gallagher / Nicole Doherty4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNamiko Martin vs Jennifer Barney2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaila Worrell / Denise Mincak vs Margaret Mitchell / Dana Carlos7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Hubert / Donna Parente vs Katherine Nannizzi / Janice Loll3-6, 4-6
2023-07-12vs Yonkers Tennis: Simply SmashingSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Elizabeth Byrne vs Lisa Rothman / MARIA MUSTE7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNamiko Martin vs Ecaterina Moisa2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Mary Mooney vs Diane Storm / Mary Ellen Sanchez6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Hubert / Donna Parente vs Merideth Mergel / Dana Melillo6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMoira Lillis / Elizabeth Byrne vs Elana Minkove / Fran Smith6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMilano Buckley vs Amy Kline7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Birgit Landgrebe vs Rebecca Stern / Lisa Ferree3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Hubert / Karen Selman vs Jennifer Fischman / Sharmeen Dossani6-3, 7-5
2023-06-26vs Pelham Rec: The Forever InsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMoira Lillis / Susan O'Brien vs Sarah Kim / Chandra Turner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNamiko Martin / Karen Selman vs Jamie Huggler / Liz Farrell6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Mary Mooney vs Mei Lau / Doreen Chung-Waldman6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-20vs Scarsdale Golf ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesMoira Lillis / Namiko Martin vs Pamela Montgomery / Leslie Andersen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Mooney / Birgit Landgrebe vs Loren Kabakov / Victoria Lasseter6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Selman / Nancy Hubert vs Constance Vaughan / Bria Moran7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Tracy McCarthy vs Christine Groves / Kate Stempel5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Byrne vs Paisley Fenyes6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Mooney / Laila Worrell vs Diana Tapper / Maria Tardio4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Loretta Lifrieri vs Ellen Saya / Staci Ramachandran2-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs Hampshire Country Club: 3.0 GreenWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan O'Brien / Moira Lillis vs Janine Clements / BEATRIZ ESCUDERO7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCatherine Chatham vs Stephanie Meltzer6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Mary Mooney vs Wendy Sayles / Catherine Lifeso2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLori de la Guardia / Karen Selman vs Alynn Perl / Ann Goode6-2, 6-0
2023-05-09vs NYAC Sugar and SliceSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBirgit Landgrebe / Mary Mooney vs Dawn Pintauro / Frances Candela6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCatherine Chatham vs Cammann Cannella2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Mena / Denise Mincak vs Eileen ORourke / Sandra Ritossa6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLoretta Lifrieri / Lori de la Guardia vs Laura Hupprich / Donna Henry4-6, 4-6
2023-05-02vs NRRC: Wonder WomenLost 04
L#1 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Moira Lillis vs Nicole Fiftal / Joanna Venar3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDenise Mincak vs Jennifer Golden4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Hubert / Deborah Briscoe vs Shelley Wahl / Danielle Morgan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Campion McCartt / Donna Parente vs Kristin DeFelice / Susan McGrath0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Elizabeth Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Denise Mincak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Lori de la Guardia
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Cristina Mena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Milano Buckley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Catherine Chatham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.84
Laila Worrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Karen Selman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Moira Lillis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Birgit Landgrebe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Susan O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Loretta Lifrieri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Deborah Briscoe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Donna Parente
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Campion McCartt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Bateman
published
Mary Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 0
Namiko Martin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Hubert
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tracy McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan O'Brien + Elizabeth Byrne4262% games+9.2% vs expected
Karen Selman + Moira Lillis5264% games+7.7% vs expected
Cristina Mena + Denise Mincak341957% games+4.9% vs expected
Catherine Chatham + Milano Buckley17658% games+2.5% vs expected
Moira Lillis + Susan O'Brien191053% games+1.8% vs expected
Moira Lillis + Mary Mooney1442% games+1.5% vs expected
Birgit Landgrebe + Mary Mooney14852% games+1.4% vs expected
Birgit Landgrebe + Moira Lillis15852% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Byrne
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Denise Mincak
54W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Lori de la Guardia
57W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cristina Mena
41W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Milano Buckley
49W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Catherine Chatham
142W–111L career · 5 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.02
Laila Worrell
37W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Karen Selman
53W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Moira Lillis
68W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Birgit Landgrebe
72W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan O'Brien
57W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Loretta Lifrieri
32W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Deborah Briscoe
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Donna Parente
19W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Jennifer Campion McCartt
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Bateman
7W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Mary Mooney
43W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Namiko Martin
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Hubert
20W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy McCarthy
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.