Teams

Moore/Memphis

2024 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-01vs Burford/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Phillips / Catherine Brimhall vs Rachel Burford / Emily Craven6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTatiana de la Barrera vs Liza Easley6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Moore / Jenny Harmeier vs Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Diana Galdieri6-2, 6-4
2024-04-17vs Langley/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKrista York / Anna Smith vs Elza McKenna / Melody Greene0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Phillips vs Melanie Schrank6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenny Harmeier / Lisa Warren vs Mary Raine Ivy / Lauren Fontenot1-6, 4-6
2024-04-12vs Heist/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngie Moore / Catherine Brimhall vs Shaila Anderson / Kim Badger6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDiana Phillips vs Theresa Heist6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Warren / Tatiana de la Barrera vs Kathy Ferrara / Jennifer Dye6-1, 6-3
2024-03-06vs George/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngie Moore / Jenny Harmeier vs Katherine Garrott / Emily Fisher6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Phillips vs Malaney George3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Brimhall / Kathryn Mayo vs Caroline Palmer / Emily Owen3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Diana Phillips
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Angie Moore
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.56
Jenny Harmeier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Catherine Brimhall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Krista York
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Mayo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tatiana de la Barrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Harmeier + Angie Moore5550% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Phillips
23W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Angie Moore
30W–42L career · 7 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jenny Harmeier
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Catherine Brimhall
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
Krista York
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.23
Kathryn Mayo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tatiana de la Barrera
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.