Teams

LAGUNA CREEK CW7.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Milla Austin
published
3.91
Eva Wilson-Lee
published
3.83
Meuy Saechao
published
3.74
Erika Stone
published
3.73
Marika Fujimoto
published
3.73
3.66
Myrthel Daquis
published
3.52
Sonja Jimenez
published
3.49
Alyssa Archerda
published 3.5
3.42
JoAnn Jaschke
published
3.39
Karen Cesar
published
3.21
Jenifer Coston
published
3.19
3.17
Carla Halligan
published 3.5
3.01
Dana Holmes
published 3.5
Gina Fong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marika Fujimoto + Jennifer Fong-Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Sonja Jimenez + Alyssa Archerda404 matchesnot enough data
Eva Wilson-Lee + Jennifer Fong-Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Milla Austin
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
Eva Wilson-Lee
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Meuy Saechao
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Erika Stone
28W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Marika Fujimoto
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Myrthel Daquis
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Sonja Jimenez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Alyssa Archerda
24W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
JoAnn Jaschke
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
Karen Cesar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jenifer Coston
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Michelle Christensen
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Carla Halligan
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Dana Holmes
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Gina Fong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.