Teams

Castle, Mandy

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-07vs Shannon, RhondaWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarla Rushing / Laura McMahon vs Joy Cloud / Kelli Nicholson6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLeslie Owens vs Carolyn Whyte7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Yeatts / Heather Biddle vs Jane Brown / Teri Norton6-3, 6-0
2025-03-31vs LeDuff, StacieWon 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Garlington / Kim Sims vs Jean Tonnar-Seale / Jennifer Moore6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Castle / Meredith Boston vs Virginia Pearson / Leslie Royals6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKasey McKay / Angela Yeatts vs Jan Woodson / Judy Gunn6-0, 6-3
2025-03-24vs Sykes, JoannaWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim Sims / Kasey McKay vs Beverly Mann / Kaye Donald6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJodi Gentry vs Anna Dotson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Bailey / Sara Jane Cole vs Kimberly Wooten / Anna Hughes6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeslie Owens / Laura McMahon vs Joanna Sykes / Jeannie Kellicut5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Sing, StephanieSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHeather Bailey / Julie Tompkins vs Elizabeth Noone / Lisa Little3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLauren Ingram vs Jennifer Kennon4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Sims / Heather Biddle vs Stephanie Sing / Kelly Mitchell6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarla Rushing / Laura McMahon vs Cindy Page / Emma Pullen6-3, 6-3
2025-02-24vs Santangelo, FayeWon 31
L#1 DoublesHeather Bailey / Sara Jane Cole vs Deborah McGehee / Jeanna Tanner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeslie Owens vs Angelina Vanlandingham6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Sims / Julie Tompkins vs Melissa Harmon / Sheila Self6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Garlington / Lauren Ingram vs Faye Santangelo / Tina Roberts6-2, 6-3
2025-02-17vs Keyes, AngieWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Bailey / Julie Tompkins vs Melanie Warren / Susan Farris6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Biddle / Meredith Boston vs Connie Brewer / Jeanine Gray6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura McMahon / Nikki Ramsey vs Gay Grantham / Kathie Hall6-1, 6-2
2025-02-10vs Collins, MindySplit 22
L#1 DoublesMandy Castle / Sara Jane Cole vs Suzy Everett / Martha Hill1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJodi Gentry vs Kim Pitts4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Ingram / Laura McMahon vs Sarah Turner / Eva Hunter1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Yeatts / Nikki Ramsey vs Kim Whitten / Mindy Collins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Bradshaw, LynnSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHeather Bailey / Sara Jane Cole vs Diane Barber / Lisa Tew6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Biddle vs Elizabeth Crisler4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Garlington / Lauren Ingram vs Jane Turner / Byron Edgecombe4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Rushing / Meredith Boston vs Kim Cumberland / Sabrina Sutherland2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Castle, Mandy6225720196
2Keyes, Angie2662654341
3LeDuff, Stacie0842857347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sara Jane Cole
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Heather Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Julie Tompkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Heather Biddle
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.09
Carla Rushing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.05
Lauren Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.02
Angela Yeatts
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Nikki Ramsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Meredith Boston
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.90
Mandy Castle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Leslie Owens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jodi Gentry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kasey McKay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shannon Garlington
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Castle + Meredith Boston2345% gamesnot enough data
Heather Bailey + Sara Jane Cole213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Jane Cole
22W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Heather Bailey
37W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Julie Tompkins
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Heather Biddle
14W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3.5
Carla Rushing
16W–28L career · 8 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Lauren Ingram
26W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3.5
Angela Yeatts
17W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Nikki Ramsey
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Meredith Boston
16W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Mandy Castle
25W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Leslie Owens
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Jodi Gentry
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kasey McKay
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Garlington
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.