Teams

ALLEN

2022 SNM 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-11vs SAMPATH/BORSODILost 12
L#1 DoublesLori McGuire / Martha Trost vs Gail Richardson / Radel Farrah3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Coon / Sally Hunter vs Janet Santackas / Diane Allen1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Unglaub / Barbara Gohrick vs Sintra Sampath / Jamie Borsodi6-4, 6-4
2022-05-28vs SAMPATH/BORSODILost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kinkel / Martha Trost vs Gail Richardson / Radel Farrah5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Blackman / Maggie Follin vs Sintra Sampath / Janet Santackas7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gohrick / Carol Coon vs Diane Allen / Jacqueline Porter4-6, 3-6
2022-05-28vs SAMPATH/BORSODIWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Blackman / Maggie Follin vs Gail Richardson / Radel Farrah0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kinkel / Martha Trost vs Sintra Sampath / Janet Santackas6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDina Schlotterbeck / Mary Joy vs Jacqueline Porter / Diane Allen2-6, 2-6
2022-05-21vs SAMPATH/BORSODIWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Kinkel / Martha Trost vs Diane Allen / Jane Derose Bamman7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaggie Follin / Cindy Blackman vs Jacqueline Porter / Janet Santackas6-3, 6-3
2022-05-15vs SAMPATH/BORSODILost 03
L#1 DoublesLori McGuire / Cindy Blackman vs Sintra Sampath / Janet Santackas6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Barbara Gohrick vs Jacqueline Porter / Gail Richardson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Unglaub / Dina Schlotterbeck vs Jamie Borsodi / Jane Derose Bamman2-6, 2-6
2022-05-15vs SAMPATH/BORSODILost 03
L#1 DoublesLori McGuire / Cindy Blackman vs Jacqueline Porter / Gail Richardson5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Barbara Gohrick vs Sintra Sampath / Janet Santackas0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSally Hunter / Mary Joy vs Jamie Borsodi / Jane Derose Bamman2-6, 2-6
2022-05-07vs SAMPATH/BORSODILost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Blackman / Maggie Follin vs Gail Richardson / Radel Farrah4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSally Hunter / Mary Joy vs Sintra Sampath / Diane Allen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gohrick / Carol Coon vs Jacqueline Porter / Paciencia Comon-Pearce4-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs SAMPATH/BORSODIWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaggie Follin / Cindy Blackman vs Jacqueline Porter / Gail Richardson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Trost / Debbie Kinkel vs Radel Farrah / Jamie Borsodi6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEllen Michnovicz / Lori McGuire vs Janet Santackas / Sintra Sampath2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAMPATH/BORSODI5316816171
2ALLEN3581636262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Cindy Blackman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.11
Debbie Kinkel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.80
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Barbara Gohrick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Dina Schlotterbeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carol Coon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Maggie Follin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Martha Trost
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Joy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Gohrick + Lori McGuire7549% games+6.4% vs expected
Ellen Michnovicz + Lori McGuire91147% games+3.9% vs expected
Maggie Follin + Martha Trost4349% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Kinkel + Martha Trost5253% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Michnovicz + Dina Schlotterbeck3348% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Follin + Cindy Blackman4151% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Gohrick + Carol Coon1439% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Michnovicz + Barbara Gohrick044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Blackman
45W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Debbie Kinkel
20W–30L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ellen Michnovicz
45W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Barbara Gohrick
10W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Dina Schlotterbeck
62W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Carol Coon
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori McGuire
36W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Follin
42W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Trost
19W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Joy
9W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.