Teams

Olympus Hills-Moore

2024 Adult USTA 18-39 League · 7.0W

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-08vs Olympus Hills-TorresWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesCelest Andrade / Catherine van Uitert vs Kaestle Muir / Nicole Huston6-2, 6-0
2024-08-05vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesCelest Andrade / Kendall Armstrong vs Katie Leikin / Kristina Magee4-6, 4-6
L#2 Female DoublesShayna Dickey / Catherine van Uitert vs Meghan Kellner / Amy Dominguez4-6, 3-6
2024-07-25vs Sports Mall-Farr/BlackWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesCelest Andrade vs Lesley Scruggs6-3, 6-2
2024-07-18vs Olympus Hills-TorresWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesCelest Andrade / Catherine van Uitert vs Kaestle Muir / Alexandra Spruill6-2, 6-4
2024-06-27Split 11
W#1 Female SinglesCatherine van Uitert vs Kaitlyn Choi6-2, 6-4
L#2 Female DoublesShayna Dickey / Celest Andrade vs Jessica Eckert / Lexi Farr5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-13vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesCelest Andrade vs Kristina Magee3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Celest Andrade
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Ashlee Chappell
published 3.5
3.49
Haley Swan
published 3.5
3.43
Carolyn Schmitz
published 4
3.40
Catherine van Uitert
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Lauren Bryce
published
Emily Fuller
published 3.5
3.24
Kendall Armstrong
published
3.17
Amanda Moore
published 3.5
Shayna Dickey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Schmitz + Amanda Moore3348% games+2.1% vs expected
Lauren Bryce + Celest Andrade314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Bryce + Amanda Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celest Andrade
106W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Ashlee Chappell
89W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Haley Swan
37W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Carolyn Schmitz
40W–32L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lauren Bryce
63W–65L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Emily Fuller
29W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kendall Armstrong
27W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Amanda Moore
53W–67L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Shayna Dickey
22W–54L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.