Teams

Pin Oak - Lucky Shots

*2025 Houston Fall League (2024) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · 4.0 Ladies

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Vivian Huang
published
3.57
Poonam Yadav
published
3.52
LIVIA PUPPIN
published
3.47
Nancy Bierhaus
published
3.44
Maskuroh Schurter
published
3.44
Tatiana Borges
published
3.37
Jill Hodgeson
published
3.36
Sayuri Pinon
published
3.35
Maria Vazquez
published
3.28
Joyce Hanlon
published
3.28
Angie Lindloff
published 3.5
3.26
Madelaine Blair
published
3.24
Cecilia Diaz
published 3.5
3.19
Shoyleen Hamilton
published
3.15
Lisa Mccarty
published
Laura Baudoin
published
Rebekah Schumacher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tatiana Borges + LIVIA PUPPIN3357% games+17.5% vs expected
Angie Lindloff + Nancy Bierhaus3247% games−4.9% vs expected
Jill Hodgeson + Nancy Bierhaus3253% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Diaz + Sayuri Pinon1442% gamesnot enough data
Jill Hodgeson + Angie Lindloff044 matchesnot enough data
Sayuri Pinon + Madelaine Blair134 matchesnot enough data
Madelaine Blair + Joyce Hanlon044 matchesnot enough data
Shoyleen Hamilton + Joyce Hanlon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vivian Huang
110W–41L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.85
Poonam Yadav
34W–33L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
LIVIA PUPPIN
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Nancy Bierhaus
27W–52L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Maskuroh Schurter
37W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Tatiana Borges
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jill Hodgeson
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Sayuri Pinon
53W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Maria Vazquez
22W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Joyce Hanlon
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Angie Lindloff
15W–42L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Madelaine Blair
10W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cecilia Diaz
19W–31L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Shoyleen Hamilton
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Lisa Mccarty
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Laura Baudoin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebekah Schumacher
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.