Teams

LA - Tightly Strung

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-21vs LA - Downtown Aces 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBita Nasseri / Susan Moreno vs Christina Buckley / Lauri Brenner3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Lara Azzopardi
published
3.07
Karen Minikes
published
2.90
Vanessa Bustillos
published
2.88
Anne Tlusty
published 3
2.86
Bita Nasseri
published 3
2.80
Heidi Cotton
published
2.74
Susan Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Kyoko Arikura
published
2.68
Beryl Mendelson
published 3
2.68
JoAnn Green
published
2.67
Morgan Handel
published
2.66
2.65
Stephanie Tsai
published
2.60
Martha Swiller
published
2.59
Diana Winters
published 3
2.50
Michele Moshay
published
2.35
2.33
Elizabeth Dill
published
Laura Smith Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Alexander + Beryl Mendelson2453% gamesnot enough data
Martha Swiller + Kyoko Arikura224 matchesnot enough data
Vanessa Bustillos + Bita Nasseri224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Tsai + Elizabeth Dill033 matchesnot enough data
Kyoko Arikura + Elizabeth Dill123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lara Azzopardi
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12
Karen Minikes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Vanessa Bustillos
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Anne Tlusty
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Bita Nasseri
22W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Heidi Cotton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.80
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
Kyoko Arikura
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Beryl Mendelson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
JoAnn Green
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Morgan Handel
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Crystal Alexander
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Stephanie Tsai
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
Martha Swiller
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Diana Winters
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Michele Moshay
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
Teresa Throenle-Somaini
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.35
Elizabeth Dill
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.33
Laura Smith Terry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.